Monday, September 30, 2013

Synchronicity and Circles of Seriousness

The movie The Matrix contains a lot of symbolism, some of it prophetic - as explained in A Love Triangle between the CIA, Turkey and Syria. I brought up the prediction of The Matrix concerning the attack on the World Trade Center on Sept. 8 in the blog Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels. The chemical attack was a false flag operation, similar to the false flag operation which appears in the plot to the movie Star Trek Into Darkness. There has been a strange synchronicity going on lately with this blog, something that is a bit hard to explain. Perhaps William Blake summed it up best in the following words:

To see a world in a grain of sand,
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand,
And eternity in an hour.

The universe is always reflecting an image of itself - where each and every minutest part is a reflection of the whole. Synchronicity and prophecy is something science cannot explain - it only makes sense if there is a spiritual world interacting with the material world. The material world is a symbolic representation of higher spiritual levels - this symbolism is something Emanuel Swedenborg called "correspondence" where a material object is a representation of something more spiritual. It is an idea that pervades the entire thought of the theology of the New Church, where behind the literal sense of the Word one can see the revelations of the internal spiritual truths of heaven. This concept can be mathematically represented by a fractal, or in physics by a hologram - where the smallest part is a reflection of the whole. The book The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality by Michael Talbot uses the hologram to explain this ancient way of thinking in modern terms. Here is a review of the book:
Author Talbot writes that ". . . there is evidence to suggest that our world and everything in it. . . are also only ghostly images, projections from a level of reality so beyond our own it is literally beyond both space and time." Hence, the title of his book. Beginning with the work of physicist David Bohm and neurophysiologist Karl Pribram, both of whom independently arrived at holographic theories or models of the universe, Talbot explains in clear terms the theory and physics of holography and its application, both in science and in explanation of the paranormal and psychic. His theory of reality accommodates this latest thinking in physics as well as many unresolved mind-body questions. This well-written and fascinating study is recommended for science collections.
- Hilary D. Burton, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, Cal.
So what is the Matrix? Some things can only be explained symbolically, or in the form of a parable. Some may be wondering just what exactly what kind of job do I do. Agents represent our perceived fears in life. The following video explains it in detail:

Now there are other matters I could explain concerning the symbolism of The Matrix, but some things can only be explained if one is within the circle of trust:

As for Jack - we shall call him Jack - he is a tough guy, very strict and professional, but he has some emotional issue about his mother. He has a bit of trouble expressing his feelings through poetry (the below clip may repeat so you have to pause it):

As for recent events, here is the assessment of what happened according to the CIA:

Saturday, September 28, 2013

The Near Death Experience of a CIA Agent

Since the advent of modern medical science, more and more people have been revived from death, and have reported a common set of experiences of the entrance of the soul into the afterlife. One usually remembers hovering above one's body, and can clairvoyantly describe events that took place in the vicinity of the body or events concerning their loved ones. They then advance through a tunnel, at the end of which is a Being of light - who is full of love and knowledge, or more accurately, is Love itself and All Knowledge itself. When encompassed in this light, we all go through a life review, and can see the impact of our actions on others. Every single action and thought is reviewed, and nothing is hidden. All is laid open for review, and it is our own conscience which judges our actions. If one passes this life review, they can go deeper, and enter the realm of light, where they see a city of light, and loved ones in their complete full beauty. For within our material body there is a spiritual body which survives after death. This was first described in the book Life After Life, by Raymond Moody M.D., who described it as the "Near Death Experience." It is from that book I became familiar with Emanuel Swedenborg, a clairvoyant who had described the Near Death Experience in the 18th century long before modern medical science rediscovered it. When describing heaven, Swedenborg stated that the center of heaven was a Being of Light, in which there was a Man - or more accurately, the God-Man. It is from the God-Man that we all have our human form.

One of the most interesting Near Death Experiences I have read about is the one of Dannion Brinkley, which is described in his book Saved by the Light. He went rather deep, and was given a set of prophecies concerning the future, many of which have been fulfilled, others have not. He was struck by lightning and was dead for about a half hour before he was revived. You see, Dannion Brinkley was a CIA agent or asset, who was involved in covert operations (of course he does not mention CIA by name). What happens to a CIA agent when they die? It depends on what they did and what was their intention. One must be curious, here is a picture of the CIA memorial wall in honor of those who died for their country:

What Dannion Brinkley saw in his life review was not good. He served in Vietnam, and one of the first things he saw in his life review was how he shot a Vietnamese colonel in the head with a sniper rifle while he was reviewing his troops.
"During my life review, I experienced this incident from the perspective of the North Vietnamese colonel. I didn't feel the pain that he must have felt. Instead, I felt his confusion at having his head blown off and sadness as he left his body and realized that he would never go home again. Then I felt the rest of the chain reaction - the sad feelings of his family when they realized they would be without their provider. I relived all of my kills in just this fashion. I saw myself make the kill and then I felt its horrible results."
The worst event in his life review was when he blew up an entire hotel of people in order to reach one heavily guarded target. He got to experience the shock and sadness of all the people's lives he had just snuffed out. However throughout this life review experience while he was dead, Dannion Brinkley has a particular insight:
"The one saving grace was that at the time, I thought what I was doing was right. I was killing in the name of patriotism, which took the edge off the horrors I had committed."
In the life review, every action is judged by the truth that one knew at the time. Every action is judged by one's intention. Thus there is a difference between killing and murder - the difference comes from one's intent. In heaven, angels do not consider external appearances, but one's internal thought, motive or intention. It is from the intention or end of a person that the nature of one's true character is known, and it is that which determine's one's eternal destiny. To quote from Emanuel Swedenborg:
"...nothing else than the end with man is regarded by the Lord. Whatever his thoughts and deeds — which vary in ways innumerable — if only the end be made good, all are good. But if the end be evil, all are evil. It is the end that rules in every thing that a man thinks and does. The angels with man, because they are angels of the Lord, do not direct anything in the man but his ends. In directing them they direct also his thoughts and actions, for all these are of the end. The end with man is his very life. All that he thinks and does has life from the end, for, as was said, they are of the end. Therefore as the end is, such is the life of a man. His end is no other than his love; for a man can have for an end nothing but what he loves. One who thinks otherwise than he does, has yet for an end what he loves." (Heavenly Arcana, n. 1317)
"...angels do not attend to any other than internal things, that is, to ends, or to intentions and purposes, and to thoughts therefrom." (Heavenly Arcana, n. 3489.2)
" is to be known that the end is what determines the character of all the deeds of a man. If his end or intention is to do good for the sake of reputation, or to procure honors or gain, then the good which he does is not good, because it is done for the sake of himself, and thus also from himself. But if his end is to do good for the sake of a fellow citizen, or of his country, or of the church, thus for the sake of the neighbor, then the good which a man does is good, for it is done for the sake of good itself, which in a general sense is the real neighbor" (Heavenly Arcana, n. 9210)
Philosophers and scientists speak of cause and effect, which corresponds to thought and action. Swedenborg takes this a step further: central to this spiritual theology is end, cause and effect. Or what is the same, intent, thought, and action. External actions are driven by thought, and all our thoughts are derived from our purpose or intent. It is our intent which is our will, the very core of our being.

So why do I bring this up now? You do not have to pull the trigger to be considered responsible for your actions. Dannion Brinkley was involved in shipping arms to third world countries, and this he saw in his life review:
"When I returned to the United States after my military duty, I continued to work for the government, performing clandestine operations. This largely involved the transport of weapons to people and countries friendly to the United States. Sometimes I was even called upon to train these people in the fine art of sniping or demolition.
"Now, in the life review, I was forced to see the death and destruction that had taken place in the world as a result of my actions. "We are all a link in the great chain of humanity," said the Being. "What you do has an effect on the other links in that chain."
"Many examples of this came to mind, but one in particular stands out. I saw myself unloading weapons in a Central American country. They were to be used to fight a war that was supported by our country against the Soviet Union.
"My task was simply to transfer these weapons from an airplane to our military interests in the area. When this transfer was completed, I got back on the airplane and left.
"But leaving wasn't so easy in my life review. I stayed with the weapons and watched as they were distributed at a military staging area. Then I went with the guns as they were used in the job of killing, some of them murdering innocent people and some the not so innocent. All in all it was horrible to witness the results of my role in this war.
"This weapons transfer in Central America was the last job I was involved in before being struck by lightning. I remember watching children cry because they had been told that their fathers were dead, and I knew these deaths were caused by the guns I had delivered.
"Then that was it, the review was over."
After this, Dannion Brinkley was quite ashamed of what he had done - he realized he had lived a very selfish life, rarely considering others, with not so much as one little act of kindness or compassion. So, after that life review in Brinkley's Near Death Experience, what was the reaction of the Being of Light? Here is what he says:
"I looked at the Being of Light and felt a deep sense of sorrow and shame. I expected a rebuke, some kind of cosmic shaking of my soul. I had reviewed my life and what I had seen was a truly worthless person. What did I deserve if not a rebuke?
"As I gazed at the Being of Light I felt as though he was touching me. From that contact I felt a love and joy that could only be compared to the nonjudgmental compassion that a grandfather has for a grandchild. "Who you are is the difference that God makes," said the Being. "And that difference is love."
"...As the Being of Light moved away, I felt the burden of this guilt being removed. I had felt the pain and anguish of reflection, but from that I had gained the knowledge that I could use to correct my life. I could hear the Being's message in my head, again as if through telepathy: "Humans are powerful spiritual beings meant to create good on the earth. This good isn't usually accomplished in bold actions, but in singular acts of kindness between people. It's the little things that count, because they are more spontaneous and show who you truly are."
The relevance of this Near Death Experience is obvious. The civil war in Syria has claimed over 100,000 lives, and there is no end in sight. The reason? Arms shipments to rebels and Al Qaeda jihadists. Who is behind the arms shipments? The CIA, Turkey and Saudi Arabia...probably with more responsibility on Saudi shoulders. And because of arms shipments flowing over the borders, the borders are forced to be closed, trapping those who are in need of humanitarian aid inside. I have seen some of accounts from reporters inside Syria, and the suffering is just horrific. No, the government of Assad is not perfect. But before the civil war, that government upheld law and order for the majority of its citizens. If he goes, what will replace him? Something not as good...similar to what we have in Iraq today, where sectarian killings continue, all in the name of blind religious belief without regard to what is most important: love, kindness and compassion.
Hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy about you, saying: 'These people draw near to Me with their mouth, And honor Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.'
Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch. (Matt. 15:7-9, 14)

Thursday, September 26, 2013

A Love Triangle between the CIA, Turkey and Syria

Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey insists he is not a dictator like Assad. I agree, he just has anger management issues and takes things a bit personally. Oh wait, I think he threw some of his top military generals and officers into jail without a trial. The relationship between Turkey and Syria has become strained since Syria shot down two Turkish jets on June 22, 2012. Turkey responded by deploying its troops along the border. Turkey is a model democracy in the Middle East and a NATO ally, but recently Erdogan has started to enact some troubling changes. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk revolutionized the country of Turkey and made it into a secular republic. The danger with Prime Minister Erdogan is that behind the scenes he has been trying to revert Turkey away from a secular republic to a backwards Islamic state.

Erdogan's favoritism to a strict form of Islam is very apparent with the fact that Turkey has been shipping arms to the Free Syrian Army across its border. From Court Case Reveals Turkey Arms Flow To Syrian Rebels. Turkey insists that all aid going across the border is humanitarian, but evidence indicates otherwise:
“The prime minister and I have repeated this numerous times. Turkey has no relationship with any radical group. I am saying this especially referring to Nusra,” said Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Sept. 10. “This is black propaganda by those circles who want to cast a shadow on Turkey’s humanitarian-based policies regarding Syria.”
Acikalin raised an objection to Davutoglu’s statement. “I may be violating the ethics rule as a lawyer, but I am choosing to talk to you because we believe that the government is suspending the rule of law by providing support to this opposition, including Jabhat al-Nusra, and putting our lives at risk here.” To make his case, Acikalin provided a copy of the indictment with the registration number 2013/125 at Hatay Criminal Court, as well as the copies of the last hearing’s transcript, dated July 5, and a copy of a petition sent by the Free Syrian Army’s (FSA) Ankara office to the state prosecutor in Hatay, dated Nov. 24, 2012.
And now for a big surprise. From The hidden real truth about Benghazi, there was a covert operation in Benghazi Libya by the CIA to ship weapons from Libya to the Free Syrian Army through the Turkish border:
According to my source, Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 to meet with his Turkish counterpart, who reportedly warned Stevens that the operation was compromised. They met in person so that Stevens could be shown overhead satellite images, taken by the Russians, of nefarious activities taking place in Turkey. But just what were these nefarious activities?
It is reasonable to suspect that these activities were more dire than just your average “gun running” operation. Since the overthrow of Qaddafi, it is estimated that upwards of 40 million tons of weapons and arms were shipped out of Libya to Syria. But it was also known inside intelligence circles that Qaddafi possessed chemical weapons in addition to numerous surface-to-air missiles. Could it be that Russia obtained unmistakable surveillance footage of the anti-Assad “rebels” being shown how to load chemical payloads onto missiles inside Turkey near the border of Syria? Weapons, of course, that were shipped from Libya by the CIA in conjunction with various Muslim Brotherhood rebel groups.  If so, such weapons could be used as a “false flag” type of operation—one that would be implemented to “set-up” Assad by making it appear that he was using these weapons on forces dedicated to his overthrow.
The above article was published on October 28, 2012 - long before the false flag operation became a reality on August 21, 2013. There are other multiple articles which discusses this CIA operation in Benghazi to ship arms to Syria - see also Benghazi Attack disrupted Major CIA Operation: Attack allegedly directed against “CIA Operatives and Contractors”. The attack on the embassy in Libya on September 11, 2012, now takes on a new meaning. See also Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels where further evidence is given that the chemical attack was a false flag operation, but under the direction of Al Qaeda and Saudi Arabia - information that is consistently ignored in western media.


In The Secret Space Program and Hidden Intelligence, at the end I discussed this very odd way extraterrestrials choose to communicate: by leaving hidden messages in movies. How they do this is not well known, but in multiple contactee reports some of these extraterrestrials are human in form and communicate telepathically. Telepaths are probably attracted to visual forms of communication. They can walk among us and you will never know it. I also mentioned that the movie The Matrix has a hidden influence behind it, as Neo's passport expires on September 11, 2001, the date the World Trade Center was attacked:

As explained in United States arming Al Qaeda to overthrow Syria, there is a relationship between the country of Syria and extraterrestrials from the Pleiades. Some Syrians may be the descendants of the Pleiades from a contact that occurred over 5000 years ago. There is also a relationship between the movie The Matrix and Star Trek Into Darkness -  the parallels are unmistakable. The latter movie includes a false flag operation as part of the plot, somewhat predicting what happened in Syria in August. Following that post, a top commander of Al Qaeda in Syria had been assassinated, practically the same day. See the comment in that blog post for the news article.

The swiss farmer Billy Meier claimed to have been contacted from the Pleiades, and the Pleiadeans he came into contact with predicted the attack of the World Trade Center back in 1987 (or Meier had borrowed this prophecy from another source). That the movie The Matrix (1999) portrays the attack of September 11, 2001 is shown in the following helicoptor scene where Morpheus is rescued from agents, which I will show again for those who have not been reading the past articles on this blog (note one of the towers has the Roman numeral MMI for the year 2001). It is worth repeating as I have something more to say about the helicopter crash:

That the above scene from The Matrix is prophetic is obvious. In fact, at the end of the scene it mentions the Oracle - a woman consulted by Neo who can foresee the future. In the following dialogue from The Matrix, the Oracle talks about free will and prophecy:
Oracle: Candy?
Neo: Do you already know if I'm going to take it?
Oracle: Wouldn't be much of an oracle if I didn't.
Neo: But if you already know, how could I make a choice?
Oracle: Because you didn't come here to make the choice. You already made it. You're here to try to understand why you made it.
As with dreams and prophecy, there are several layers of meaning to the rescue of Morpheus in the Matrix. It symbolically portrays the following events:
1. The attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
2. The attack on CIA agents at Benghazi on September 11, 2012. This operation involved a huge arms shipment from Libya to Syrian rebels.
3. The conflicting decision President Obama was about to make to launch military strikes on Syria, based on false intelligence. This came to a conclusion on September 11, 2013 when Syria offered to have its chemical arsenal destroyed. Thus I showed this scene on this blog before that date. Morpheus is a symbolic representation of President Obama:

So how is a helicopter involved in all of this? I discussed some of that previously, but here is an interesting news item I recently found: Turkish warplanes shoot down Syrian helicopter. A Syrian helicopter was shot down near the Turkish border on September 16:
Turkey scrambled two F-16 jets along the border between its southern Hatay province and Syria after warning the Mi-17 helicopter it was approaching Turkish airspace shortly before 2:30 p.m. (1130 GMT), the military said in a statement.
Syria called the reaction "hasty" and accused Turkey of trying to escalate tensions along the border.
Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc said a warplane shot down the helicopter after it ventured up to 2 km (1 miles) into Turkey near the border town of Yayladagi. "It was repeatedly warned by our air defense elements," he said.
It came down in a ball of flames inside Syrian territory after being hit, amateur video footage showed.
...Syria's army acknowledged the helicopter had strayed into Turkish airspace for a short time while monitoring "terrorists" moving across the border into Syria, but said it was an accident and that the aircraft was on its way back when it was shot down.
In a statement carried by state news agency SANA, it accused Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan's government of trying to increase tensions between the two countries.
Here is the actual video of the Syrian helicopter being shot down - keep in mind this happened on September 16, days after I posted the Matrix helicopter scene on this blog (just look back at the blog post Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels, posted on September 8, 2013):

The chemical attack of August 21, 2013 was a false flag operation that was going to be used to instigate a war. Similar to how the attack of September 11, 2001 was used as a false flag to justify to go to war against Iraq. There is NO EVIDENCE that Assad launched the chemical attack of August 21. The U.S. government has yet to show evidence for its claims. However there is evidence that traces the chemical attack to Syrian rebels and Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda betrayed the Syrian rebels by having them get killed in the chemical attack. This caused a breach between the Syrian rebels and Al Qaeda in Syria, but the media is not talking about that. In fact, it looks like there is now an all out war between the Syrian rebels and the foreign jihadists: see Rebel vs. Rebel.

And if CIA analysts are smart, anyone can see here that continued support of the Syrian rebels or Al Qaeda extremists is just absolutely pointless. Unless of course Saudi Arabia is arming the jihadist Al Nusra, in which case the U.S. and Saudi Arabia are now forced to fight a proxy war against each other.


In the blog post Precognitive Fictional Novels, and Synchronicity, I discussed how authors of fictional novels are somehow inspired to predict future events in remarkable detail. If that can happen for fictional novels, the same can happen for movies. In the blog post The Terminal Dilemma of Edward Snowden, I mentioned that the situation of Edward Snowden in Russia was accurately described in the movie The Terminal. And following that blog post Snowden was granted temporary asylum in Russia - just as the movie predicted. In Precognitive Fictional Novels, and Synchronicity I also briefly mentioned the movie Stranger than Fiction - where a man named Harold Crick finds that his life is beginning to follow a pattern that is described in a fictional novel:

So considering the movie The Matrix, who is Neo? Well Neo is a computer programmer for the MetaCortex software company. MetaCortex means "transcending the boundaries of the brain." He eventually rides in a helicopter to rescue Morpheus who must leap from the window to the helicopter:

Here is a view of the Freedom Tower from the window of the building where Neo works - the Freedom Tower was built to replace the World Trade Center that was destroyed on September 11, 2001:

Helicopters are seen often flying across the Hudson between Neo's workplace and Freedom Tower. Actually there is a helicopter as a tiny speck flying in the above picture. Here is a better  view of the Freedom Tower where Neo sometimes goes for a walk:

Neo is not Neo. Neo is Theo. Yes, my first name happens to be Theodore, you can see the name in my email in the books I published on Emanuel Swedenborg on Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Around the time of September 11, 2013, this mystery woman with dark glasses shows up, but then disappears. Maybe a coincidence, but that really took me by surprise. I think her name is Trinity:

Not her real picture of course. What do I know about Trinity? I can say that Trinity is played by Carrie-Anne Moss, a Canadian actress who was born in Burnaby, British Columbia. According to Google Maps, Burnaby is about 47 km away from Langley, British Columbia:

When Trinity first meets Neo, the dialogue in the move The Matrix goes something like this:
Trinity: Hello Neo.
Neo: How do you know that name?
Trinity: I know a lot about you.
Neo: Who are you?
Trinity: My name is Trinity.
Neo: Trinity. The Trinity? That cracked the IRS database?
Trinity: That was a long time ago... What?
Neo: I just thought, um, you were a guy.
Trinity: Most guys do.
Neo: That was you on my computer. How did you do that?
So Trinity hacked into the IRS database. Coincidentally, Harold Crick from Stranger than Fiction is an IRS tax man. So who is Trinity? That is a secret. So is the Matrix. Yes, I agree, this is very weird. Believe it or not this has happened to me before: I was able to call up friends who also appeared with me in a fictional novel and was able to know things about them no one else knew. And they thought it was weird as well.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

United States arming Al Qaeda to overthrow Syria

In the previous post Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels I showed that Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda were responsible for launching the chemical attack against their own rebel Syrian allies - which happened to have killed over 400 children. This was a false flag operation against the government of Assad in order to get the United States involved in a military strike against Syria to turn the tide of the civil war. This failed, with a dramatic result: Syria has volunteered to unconditionally surrender its entire arsenal of chemical weapons, and has begun to execute on that plan. Despite what the media and state department have been reporting, the U.N. report does NOT indicate who did it: for this see UN Report on Ghouta Gas Incident Points to Evidence Tampering, not Syrian Culpability.

With the surrender of the entire stock of chemical weapons one would think mission accomplished, end of matter. That is not the case. From the article
Obama waives ban on arming terrorists to allow aid to Syrian opposition it looks like the United States has provided a possible means to provide Al Qaeda terrorists to help overthrow the Syrian government:
President Obama waived a provision of federal law designed to prevent the supply of arms to terrorist groups to clear the way for the U.S. to provide military assistance to "vetted" opposition groups fighting Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Some elements of the Syrian opposition are associated with radical Islamic terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, which was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pa., in 2001. Assad's regime is backed by Iran and Hezbollah. The president, citing his authority under the Arms Export Control Act, announced today that he would "waive the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of the AECA related to such a transaction."
So look at that. The United States, which launched a so-called "war on terror" against Al Qaeda, may plan to provide financial and military support for Al Qaeda terrorists. Once the story became public, the National Security Council released this statement:
This action will allow the U.S. Government to provide or license, where appropriate, certain non-lethal assistance inside or related to Syria. This includes: 1) chemical weapons-related personal protective equipment to international organizations, including the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, for the conduct of their operations; 2) chemical weapons-related life-saving assistance for organizations implementing Department of State or U.S. Agency for International Development programs to strengthen local Syrian health care providers’ ability to prepare for and respond to any use of chemical weapons; and 3) defensive chemical weapons-related training and personal protective equipment to select vetted members of the Syrian opposition, including the Supreme Military Council, to protect against the use of chemical weapons. This action is part of longstanding and ongoing efforts to provide life-saving chemical weapons-related assistance to people in need in Syria.
Why do this? Because the U.S. military knows that the Syrian rebels have been provided chemical weaponry by Saudi Arabia, and now they quietly need to dispose and remove them. However there is nothing in the waiver that prevents other aid from going to Al Qaeda terrorists: it is not a restrictive waiver. And indeed, the CIA has started to ship weapons to Syrian rebels: see U.S. weapons reaching Syrian rebels. The U.S. policy is to prolong a horrible civil war that has taken over 100,000 lives instead of seeking a peaceful solution. In fact, there has been a quiet build up of U.S. military in Jordan, on the border with Syria. From U.S. military presence in Jordan quietly grows:
Even as U.S. military officials privately maintain there are no immediate plans for action against the Syrian regime, the American presence next door in Jordan is quietly growing as is an increased U.S. military capability to defend that nation.
U.S. military assets either in place or due to arrive include: Patriots, F-16s
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel's approval to keep a Patriot missile battery and a detachment of F-16s there indefinitely adds about 400 troops to the U.S. presence.
While the units officially support U.S.-Jordanian military cooperation, they provide a real capability in a crisis.
The Patriot battery would be used to defend Jordan against any missiles launched from Syria. The F-16s "send a message" to Syria, says one senior U.S. military official, that the United States will defend Jordan, if needed.
This U.S. military build up occurred in JUNE of 2013, months in advance of the chemical attack of August 21. A chemical attack which was probably planned by Saudi Arabia, a U.S. ally. See Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels. Saudi intelligence has been providing false information to U.S. lawmakers in order to pull U.S. into yet another war. In the meantime, many Syrian refugees are now stuck at the border waiting to cross into Jordan - see Syrian refugee border build-up continues as violence rises. Unfortunately, many innocent lives are caught in the crossfire of this civil war. Hopefully they can cross into Jordan without Syrian rebels flowing back in.


In the middle of this, the Syria war has been monitored by extraterrestrial spacecraft. I showed a number of the UFO videos from Syria in Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels. When the chemical attack of August 21 took place, the U.S. was going to respond with military strikes. And what was the Pentagon going to target? From Obama Weighs ‘Limited’ Strikes Against Syrian Forces:
An American official said that the initial target lists included fewer than 50 sites, including air bases where Syria’s Russian-made attack helicopters are deployed.
And this from U.S. Mulls Over More Possible Targets For Syria Strike:
Binney says Pentagon planners may well decide to take out Syria's military helicopter fleet. "That would really limit their ability to keep resupplying some of these garrisons that are under siege, especially up in the north," Binney says. "Part of the battle has been a Syrian strategy to keep these outposts resupplied."
Instead of negotiating for the removal of chemical weapons, the U.S. plan was to launch military strikes. Military strikes which would have targeted "helicopters" which were causing problems for the Free Syrian Army. Once the military strike was announced and then delayed, the Pentagon was surprised when they saw additional targets "moving around" to different locations in Syria - some targets which they did not know even existed. So if there are extraterrestrial UFOs in Syria, where are they from? One possibility is that these extraterrestrials are from the Pleiades, who have human form. The Swiss farmer Billy Meier claimed to have been contacted by them and was given extensive information. In 1987, a Plejaran known as Quetzal said this to Billy Meier (from The Henoch Prophecies):
The USA will set out against the Eastern countries ahead of all other financial states and simultaneously she will have to defend herself against the Eastern intruders. In all, America will play the most decisive role, when in the guise to strive for peace and to fight against terrorism she invades many countries of the Earth, bombs and destroys everything and brings thousandfold deaths to the populations. The military politics of the USA will likewise know no limits, as neither will their economic and other political institutions which will be focused on building and operating a world police force, as it is the case already for a long time. But that will not be enough, and, in the guise of a so-called peaceful globalisation, American politics will aspire to gain absolute control of the world concerning supremacy in economy.
If things go too far in these future wars initiated by the U.S., the extraterrestrials will give up their anonymity and intervene to prevent the suffering of innocent lives:
And at this time, the possibility could become reality that extraterrestrial forces intervene against the Western industrialised countries, because these will be responsible for the extreme and enormous disaster of the coming evil times. These extraterrestrial forces will give up their anonymity and their state of secrecy and will assist those who are being terrorised by the irresponsibly acting Western countries, should this possibility become reality.
How valid these prophecies are is not known, as some of the material from Meier has been shown to have been faked.  However he draws from other sources without acknowledgment.


The question arises, why would extraterrestrial UFOs from the Pleiades directly intervene in the the civil war of Syria? There are several reasons. One is, the government of Damascus has a huge arsenal of chemical weapons, which they have now committed to put under international control to have them destroyed. This is very good news. It would be disastrous if this had fallen into the hands of Al Qaeda. Direct extraterrestrial contact began in 1952, and one of the primary motivations for contact was to stop us from destroying the planet with nuclear weaponry. Extraterrestrial UFOs have been seen around nuclear reactors and nuclear missile sites. See UFOs over Chernobyl and Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants. They have appeared over nuclear missile silos and have demonstrated their capability to arm and disarm the missiles, which I discussed briefly in The Orion Messages of Stan Romanek. We are destroying this unique planet and there are extraterrestrial visitors which I determined to stop us from doing that. This is one reason for intervention.

The second reason for extraterrestrial intervention in the civil war of Syria is that can easily escalate and spill over into a wider war. Russia backs the Assad regime, whereas the U.S. backs Al Qaeda related groups which support the Free Syrian Army. If military strikes occurred this could have easily escalated. For this possible future see A Prophecy of World War III:
And after the second great struggle between the nations (World War II) will come a third universal conflagration, which will determine everything. There will be entirely new weapons. In one day more men win die than in all previous wars combined. Battles will be fought with artificial guns. Gigantic catastrophes will occur. With open eyes will the nations of the earth enter into these catastrophes. They will not be aware of what is happening, and those who will know and tell, will be silenced. Every thing will become different than before, and in many places the earth will be only just a great cemetery. The third great, great war will be the end for many nations.
Can prophecies be stopped or mitigated? Yes they can. This is the reason why I decided not to publish the second half of The Decoded Prophecies of Nostradamus. The future CAN be changed, through a change in free will, a change in the course of action.


Besides the arsenal of chemical weapons of Syria, and a chance that the civil war could start World War III, there is a third reason for intervention from the Pleiades. This has to do with a contact that occurred between the earth and those from the Pleiades over 5000 years ago. It is described briefly in the book of Genesis:
Now it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose. And the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown. (Gen. 6:1-4)
The "sons of God" here are not angels, they are a race of extraterrestrials which descended to earth and mated with the women, and produced a race of giants. There have been archaeological digs with remains of giant humans that have been found, but that is beyond the scope of discussion here. Many of their descendants became rulers of those on earth due to their superior intellect and strength. This union between a race of extraterrestrials and women on earth is described in more detail in the apocryphal book of Enoch:
And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.' And Semjaza, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.' And they all answered him and said: 'Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.' Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. (Enoch 6:1-7)
These were not spiritual angelic beings but rather extraterrestrial humans which descended upon Mount Hermon. The word for angel simply means "messenger." The summit of Mount Hermon straddles the border between Syria, Israel and Lebanon and is the highest point in Syria. Part of it is in the buffer zone between Syria and Israel, the highest permanent manned UN position in the world. Here is a map with the location of Mount Hermon circled in red:

So in other words, the civil war in Syria is occuring in a location that may be considered as the ancient "homeland" of these extraterrestrials. A civil war that may be killing their descendants. And this alone may be reason for them to directly intervene. So where did these extraterrestrials come from? There were seven main stars in the Pleiades, which in Greek mythology was represented by the seven sisters: Maia, Electra, Taygete, Alcyone, Celaeno, Sterope, and Merope. Some of the most prominent Olympian gods had relationships with them and produced several children. In the book of Enoch this group of angels that descended to mate with the women are represented by "seven stars":
I saw there seven stars like great burning mountains, and to me, when I inquired regarding them, The angel said: 'This place is the end of heaven and earth: this has become a prison for the stars and the host of heaven. (Enoch 18:13-14)
And I saw there something horrible: I saw neither a heaven above nor a firmly founded earth, but a place chaotic and horrible. And there I saw seven stars of the heaven bound together in it, like great mountains and burning with fire. (Enoch 21:2-4)
According to the book Enoch those from the Pleiades were bound in the underworld for their transgression of mating with the women of earth. In Swedenborg's visions he does describe a certain group of antediluvians bound in the spiritual underworld, but for a completely different reason: self-pride, and the desire to be worshipped to rule over others. That the seven stars of the book of Enoch are the Pleiades is confirmed from an ancient tradition of the Near East:
"In the ancient Near East, the Pleiades were associated with the binding of the Sibettu demons of which there are seven. The Sibettu-Pleiades were designated sons of the underworld god Enmesarra, who, when defeated by Marduk, were bound and placed in jail. Enmesarra and his sons remain under permanent guard, and at night the demon sons are the Pleiades in the eastern sky, seven stars bound." (from A Study of the Geography of 1 Enoch 17-19, by Kelley Coblentz Bautch, p 148, from Astronomy confirms the accuracy of the Book of Enoch).
In ancient times, the star system of the Pleiades was considered so important that temples were aligned to them at their rising or setting. The Great Pyramid of Egypt is known to have several star alignments, and one of them is an alignment to the star Alcyone of the Pleiades. The descending shaft of the Great Pyramid is perfectly aligned to the pole star. Within the descending shaft of the Great Pyramid there is a set of scored lines in the wall that point to the star Alcyone, as shown in the below diagram:

Whereas the descending shaft is always aligned to the north pole, the alignment of the scored lines with the star Alcyone occurred only on two particular dates: 2141 B.C. and 3441 B.C. (the date in the above diagram is off by 3 years). Of these two dates, the year 3441 B.C. is significant - according to Biblical chronology, the year 3441 B.C. was the year of the birth of Jared, the father of Enoch. That 3441 B.C. was the date of the birth of Jared is beyond the scope of this blog, but some evidence that this is so can be found in the blog article The Ancient Astronomy of the Bible. The Hebrew name Jared means "descent" - and according to one Jewish tradition, he was so named as he was born in the year in which the sons of God descended to earth to mate with women. Thus the book of Enoch states "And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon." In other words, the Great Pyramid of Egypt may be commemorating the date in which people from the stars descended to make contact with those on earth. The passages of the Great Pyramid are symbolic, and represents the descent of the soul into earthly matter, and the ultimate escape of the soul to dwell in heaven among the stars.


As I said in an earlier blog The Secret Space Program and Hidden Intelligence, in 1987 those of the Pleiades were well aware that the World Trade Center would be attacked by terrorists:
With [America's] global conflicts which are continuously instigated by her and which will continue far into the future, America is creating enormous hatred against her, worldwide, in many countries. As a result, America will experience enormous catastrophes which will reach proportions barely imaginable to people of Earth. The destruction of the WTC, i.e., the World Trade Center, by terrorists will only be the beginning.
Also in the blog The Secret Space Program and Hidden Intelligence I explained an interesting way in which extraterrestrials within our solar system communicate with those on earth: somehow they leave hidden messages within movies. It is an indirect way of communication without revealing their presence. This may be done through a hidden way of inspiration through telepathy to those who create these movies, or through influencing the script. The CIA is known to help influence scripts of Hollywood movies as they know it will be seen by a large number of people. One of the movies that was definitely influenced is The Matrix: the passport of Neo expires on September 11, 2001:

In the rescue of Morpheus, Morpheus is rescued by a black helicopter that shows up by a high rise building and shoots the agents that are keeping him captive through the window.

Morpheus is then placed on top of a building with the Roman numerals MMI - which is the number 2001, for the year 2001. The helicopter then crashes into an adjacent high rise building, depicting the attack of September 11, 2001. This can hardly be a coincidence. The movie script was influenced, and it also represents the events of September 11, 2013. Morpheus is a symbolic representation of Obama, who came close to ordering a military strike on Syria based on false intelligence from a false flag operation:

Unfortunately, Morpheus is still under the influence of the agents, as arms are now being given to terrorists and Syrian rebels to overthrow the Syrian government.


The latest installment of the Star Trek film franchise is an interesting one. I just watched it and was surprised by some of the information contained within this movie. Like the movie The Matrix, I do not consider it to be a coincidence. The movie was released in April of 2013. The general theme of the movie is how a military organization - in this case Star Fleet - starts to lose its ethical and moral bearings by bending and breaking the rules in order to accomplish its military goals. Who is good, and who is evil? That is not exactly clear any more. In many ways this movie is describing U.S. foreign and military policy to instigate wars. The big surprise? It describes a false flag operation - a surgical miliary strike - that is arranged by Star Fleet in order to start a war with the Klingon Empire. The movie presents in a symbolic manner exactly what just happened in the last two months in Syria, where certain parties tried to use a chemical attack in Syria in order to have the U.S. launch a military strike in Syria.

Below is the first trailer. It makes this statement: "You think you can't make mistakes, but there is going to come a moment when you are going to realize you are wrong about that: and you are going to get yourself, and everyone under your command, killed." It ends with a super-human extraterrestrial stating: "Is there anything you would not do, for your family?" I think Star Fleet has made a particular group of extraterrestrials very upset:

Now here is another trailer of the movie. This one is significant: it shows a scene of a black hovercraft shooting at Star Fleet command through a window in a high rise building. The black hovercraft gets damaged, and the pilot escapes using a teleporter. This is practically the EXACT SAME SCENE as the rescue of Morpheus by a black helicopter. The scene which depicts the attack of September 11. The attack which was predicted by the Pleiadeans back in 1987:

So what is the issue? Star Fleet's top agent, John Harrison, is revealed to be from an ancient extraterrestrial race who in ancient times were exiled. Similar to what happened to those from the Pleiades who had mated with women in ancient times. They live much longer and are highly intelligent. The reason for his vendetta? Star Fleet is holding members of his family and crew hostage. Since they are being held hostage, he is forced to work for them to develop advanced weaponry and defense systems underground. That is the issue. And the movie depicts a false flag operation, similar to the chemical attack in Syria which was to be used as a false flag to get the U.S. to bomb Syria. The false flag operation is foiled when it is revealed publicly, and different elements within Star Fleet are then forced to fight against each other in a hidden war. Uncanny.


Senator John McCain has constantly been pushing for military strikes against Syria. He is now pushing for more aid to be sent to Syrian rebels. And here is this recent article from September 19: John McCain denies study's finding that half of Syrian rebels are jihadists. It states the following:
At a conference held by the Council on Foreign Relations on Tuesday, Sen. John McCain, R.-Ariz., who’s one of the leading advocates for U.S. military intervention in the Syrian civil war, denied that half of the rebels in that country are comprised of Islamic extremists, as found by a recent study.
The study, performed by defense consultancy IHS Jane’s, found that nearly half of the members of the rebel groups trying to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime are comprised of jihadists.
At least 10,000 of these fighters are linked to al Qaida, along with 30,000 to 35,000 who also hold extremist Islamic views, but are maintaining a focus on Syria rather than taking their movement global.
Senator John McCain wants to deny that about half of the Syrian rebels belong to Al Qaeda or extreme Islamic jihadists. He is not concerned. Why? He says this:
McCain further denied that al Qaida could take over Syria because “Syria is a moderate nation. Syria has the highest literacy rate of any nation in the Middle East. They are not going to submit to a jihadist or Al Qaida group governing them. They will not.”
The article then says this:
While direct military intervention didn’t happen, the Obama administration has started sending lethal weaponry to the rebel groups. Last week, the Washington Post reported that the CIA has begun shipping weapons to them.
As long as the U.S. continues to aid the Syrian rebels - many of whom are extreme Islamic radicals - it is perpetuating an endless civil war with no end in sight. Despite this Senator John McCain supports this policy. A few years ago a huge black V-shaped UFO appeared over the state of Arizona, which was seen by thousands. This was described in the blog post Largest Mass Sighting of a HUGE UFO: the Phoenix Lights. The following video clip is a press conference of Senator John McCain taken from the movie Night Skies. Senator McCain describes the Phoenix Lights incident over Arizona. He says that UFOs are of "great interest" to him. I think I now know why this huge UFO appeared over the state of Arizona. It obviously wanted to be seen. It wanted to be seen flying over the state of Senator John McCain.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

Saudi Arabia giving Chemical Weapons to Syrian Rebels

The false media propaganda to support military strikes against Syria is in full gear. And the government and media keep repeating that the evidence is "undeniable." Of course it is deniable: they simply have no evidence. There is no doubt a chemical attack occurred. There is doubt about who ordered the attack. The White House, lacking evidence, says "common sense" proves Assad's government was responsible for the chemical attacks in Syria. Since when is "common sense" proof? And the other "evidence" that is used is to show pictures of dead bodies. Again, that is not proof. This is what is known as "emotional" propaganda. It makes no sense whatsoever for Assad to launch a chemical attack in a region that he controls, and in a war that he is winning. It does make sense for the rebels backed by Saudi Arabia to stage a chemical attack, to help enlist support from the West to turn the tide of the war in their favor. Rebels who happen to be supported by Al-Qaeda terrorists. 

So for those of you who are busy getting their children ready for school, keep in mind that there are many children that are unable to go to school. They are living in tents. And in Syria, the schools are being filled with Syrian military personnel to avoid getting hit by a tomahawk missile.


The West has an ulterior motive in this: beyond the chemical weapon issue, they would like to see the rebels win the war. This is not just a civil war, it is a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The U.S. privately supports the rebels because they want to see Assad go. The long term military objective? Control of oil resources. From Syrian Oil And Gas: Little-Known Facts on Syria’s Energy Resources And Russia's Help:
Syria possessed 2.5 billion barrels of crude oil as of January 2013, which makes it the largest proved reserve of crude oil in the eastern Mediterranean according to the Oil & Gas Journal estimate, besides Iraq.
But that is not all. From Oil and Gas find offshore Syria motive for US Israeli mercenary uprising and bloodshed in Syria:
The U.S. Geological Survey reported that the Levant Basin, which covers Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Cyprus and Palestine, contains around 122 trillion cubic feet of gas and at least 1.7 billion barrels of oil.
Most wars are not random. Most are staged in advance. Staged wars then require a "pretext" to get the war started:
On March 2nd, 2007 retired general of the United States Army Wesley Clark revealed that the US government had planned just 10 days after 9/11 to attack seven countries in five years, “starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran”. As George W Bush is quoted as saying “Mission Accomplished” for Iraq, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia and Libya. Only 2 more to go – Syria and Iran.
Remember the Vietnam War? The pretext for that war was an attack in the Gulf on Tonkin - an attack that never occurred. They lied. Remember the Second Gulf War against Iraq? That was based on a supposed link with the attack of September 11 (false) and on false intelligence reports of weapons of mass destruction. They lied again.


Now for some truth. Who launched chemical weapons in Syria? Lets talk about some facts. Facts that the western media will not tell you. How about this one: Russia gave UN 100-page report in July blaming Syrian rebels for Aleppo sarin attack. In March of 2013, Syrian rebels made use of Sarin gas in an attack on Aleppo:
Russia said its investigation of the March 19 incident was conducted under strict protocols established by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the international agency that governs adherence to treaties prohibiting the use of chemical weapons. It said samples that Russian technicians had collected had been sent to OPCW-certified laboratories in Russia.
“The Russian report is specific,” the ministry statement said. “It is a scientific and technical document.”
The Russian statement said Russian officials had broken the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons’ code of silence on such probes only because Western nations appear to be “preparing the ground for military action” in retaliation for the Aug. 21 incident.
Evidence points to Syrian rebels making use of the sarin gas:
The statement’s summary of the report said that neither the munitions nor the poison gas in the Khan al Asal attack appeared to fit what is possessed by the Syrian government. The statement said Russian investigators studied the site, sent the materials they found to study to the Russian laboratories of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and followed agreed-upon United Nations investigation standards.
According to the statement, the report said the shell “was not regular Syrian army ammunition but was an artisan-type similar to unguided rocket projectiles produced in the north of Syria by the so-called gang ‘Bashair An-Nasr.’”
The Russian analysis found soil and shell samples contained a sarin gas “not synthesized in an industrial environment,” the statement said. The report said the chemical mix did not appear to be a modern version of the deadly agent but was closer to those “used by Western states for producing chemical weapons during World War II.”
Not only is there an intelligence report, there is video showing the rebels launching the chemical attack against Aleppo in March:

Instead they are talking about an attack that took place on August 21, 2013. So who launched that attack? According to rebel witnesses, the sarin gas was given to them by Saudi Arabia. Some did not know they were chemical weapons. From Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack:
...from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack.
“My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” said Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of a rebel fighting to unseat Assad, who lives in Ghouta.
Abdel-Moneim said his son and 12 other rebels were killed inside of a tunnel used to store weapons provided by a Saudi militant, known as Abu Ayesha, who was leading a fighting battalion. The father described the weapons as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”
Ghouta townspeople said the rebels were using mosques and private houses to sleep while storing their weapons in tunnels.
Abdel-Moneim said his son and the others died during the chemical weapons attack. That same day, the militant group Jabhat al-Nusra, which is linked to al-Qaeda, announced that it would similarly attack civilians in the Assad regime’s heartland of Latakia on Syria’s western coast, in purported retaliation.
“They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them,” complained a female fighter named ‘K.’ “We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”
“When Saudi Prince Bandar gives such weapons to people, he must give them to those who know how to handle and use them,” she warned. She, like other Syrians, do not want to use their full names for fear of retribution.
A well-known rebel leader in Ghouta named ‘J’ agreed. “Jabhat al-Nusra militants do not cooperate with other rebels, except with fighting on the ground. They do not share secret information. They merely used some ordinary rebels to carry and operate this material,” he said.
“We were very curious about these arms. And unfortunately, some of the fighters handled the weapons improperly and set off the explosions,” ‘J’ said.
So there you go. Not only are rebel forces in Syria making use of chemical weapons, Saudi Arabia is supplying them with weapons. According to this witness testimony, the attack of August 21 had nothing to do with the Assad government. Not only that, it was the intelligence agency of Saudi Arabia that first brought attention to the supposed use of sarin gas by Assad to Washington:
According to U.K.’s Independent newspaper, it was Prince Bandar’s intelligence agency that first brought allegations of the use of sarin gas by the regime to the attention of Western allies in February.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported that the CIA realized Saudi Arabia was “serious” about toppling Assad when the Saudi king named Prince Bandar to lead the effort.
“They believed that Prince Bandar, a veteran of the diplomatic intrigues of Washington and the Arab world, could deliver what the CIA couldn’t: planeloads of money and arms, and, as one U.S. diplomat put it, wasta, Arabic for under-the-table clout,” it said.
Bandar has been advancing Saudi Arabia’s top foreign policy goal, WSJ reported, of defeating Assad and his Iranian and Hezbollah allies.
To that aim, Bandar worked Washington to back a program to arm and train rebels out of a planned military base in Jordan.
Before the attack of August 21, in July Syrian forces seized a rebel lab near Damascus. In the lab there were poisonous chemicals that had been given to the rebels from Saudi Arabia:

This news report came in JULY of 2013 - the report says the rebels had been planning to use the chemicals in an attack on Damascus. Moreover, Syrian forces found over 200 barrels of chemical weapons - enough to wipe out an entire city. Now, for the August attack, satellite imagery shows that shells were launched from Douma, north-east of Damascus, a rebel held territory. A Syrian activist there reports that they even know who gave the order - an Al-Qaeda operative aiding the rebels:

From Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies there was a phone call intercept between a Syrian rebel and an official from Saudi Arabia, in which the rebel stated they had used chemical weapons:
On Aug. 23, hosted an audio recording of a phone call broadcast on Syrian TV between a terrorist affiliated with the rebel civilian militia “Shuhada al-Bayada Battalion” in Homs, Syria, and his Saudi Arabian boss, identified as “Abulbasit.” The phone call indicates rebel-affiliated terrorists in Syria, not the Assad government, launched the chemical weapons attack in Deir Ballba in the Homs, Syria, countryside.
The terrorist said his group, which comprises 200 terrorists escaped from al-Bayadah to al-Daar al-Kabera through a tunnel, needed to buy weapons to attack Homs.
The Saudi financier, who was in Cairo, asked the Syrian terrorists to give details about his group and how it will receive the money. The Saudi admitted his support to terrorists in Daraa and the Damascus countryside. The Syrian terrorist told him that one of the achievements of his “battalion” was the use of chemical weapons in Deir Ballba.
The recorded phone call disclosed the cooperation between two terrorist groups in Syria to bring two bottles of Sarin Gas from the Barzeh neighborhood in Damascus.
And look - the United Nations itself - the U.N. - states that the chemical attacks in Syria were most likely done by the Syrian rebels, NOT the government of Assad. See this BBC News report:

In Turkey, rebel forces associated with Al-Nusra were caught carrying Sarin gas into Syria:

So, where is the evidence that Assad ordered the chemical attack on August 21? There is no evidence. All the report says is that a chemical attack occurred. Intelligence analysts call the association with Assad "tenuous", "flimsy", and they are "puzzled" as to why he would do that. When pressed for evidence, the U.S. government says that is "classified." Its classified because they do not have any facts to support going to war against Syria. ANYONE can go on the internet and find plenty of evidence that Syrian rebels - backed by Al-Qaeda terrorists and Saudi Arabia - have been given chemical weapons. Even Fox News cannot hide this fact: in Pro-strike lawmakers mum as startling videos surface of Syrian rebels they say this:
Lawmakers who were early champions of a U.S. strike on Assad regime targets in Syria have stayed mum as video clips emerge appearing to show opposition soldiers both killing unarmed men and indicating they have possession of chemical weapons.
The latest, a video on, purported to show a rebel militant in Syria claiming to have chemical weapons, and saying he's willing to target women and children.
So here we are. The U.S. Government is asking the people - and Congress - to support military strikes against Syria in order to help Al-Qaeda terrorists, who are willing to use chemical weapons against women and children. For the intelligence agencies who provided this so-called "evidence" to the U.S. Government, I ask one question: ARE YOU A BUNCH OF IDIOTS?  No, you aren't idiots, at least when you have your thinking cap on. You know exactly what you are doing. Do you realize the long term repercussions? Have you heard of "blow-back"?


Syrian rebel forces in Ghouta stated that Saudi Prince Bandar was responsible for the supply of chemical weapons. So who is this guy? Well this gets very interesting. From 1983 to 2005 he was the Saudi ambassador to the United States. Then in 2012, his role changed. From wikipedia:
Bandar bin Sultan was appointed Director General of Saudi Intelligence Agency on 19 July 2012 replacing Muqrin bin Abdulaziz. Although no official reason for the appointment was provided, the appointment occurred after growing tension between Sunnis and Shiites in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. It was also considered as a move of Saudi Arabia to display more aggressive foreign policy given the regional challenges that comes from Iran and Syria. Prince Bandar is also a member of the Military Service Council.
So in the independent assessment - before this chemical weapon outbreak - is that he is in charge of overseeing support for the Syrian rebels. He is a good family friend of the Bush family. During the Reagan administration, he was involved in the Iran-Contra affair: where U.S. officials agreed to give arms to Iran to obtain financing for terrorists in Central America:
He was exposed for his involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. He had arranged $32 million in Saudi financing for the Nicaraguan Contras.
Here is another well known but unpublicized fact: it is very likely that elements of the government of Saudi Arabia were involved in assisting the hijackers to accomplish their attack on the World Trade Center on Septembe 11, 2001. From Was the Saudi Government Involved in the 9/11 Terror Attacks? -
Since 2002, when former senator Bob Graham led the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry (JICI) into the 9/11 attacks, he has insisted that members of the Saudi government played a role. But he’s had a hard time getting others to listen. “There’s no question in my mind that the Saudi government was involved in 9/11,” the Florida Democrat tells The Daily Beast. “But there’s still so much we don’t know. Unfortunately, many Americans seem to have lost interest.”
So what facts do we have? What about this:
The FBI-led investigation in Sarasota reportedly focused on Saudi millionaire Abdulaziz al-Hijji and his wife, Anoud. Their upscale home was owned by Anoud al-Hijji’s father, Esam Ghazzawi, an adviser to Prince Fahd bin Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, the nephew of King Fahd.
The al-Hijji family reportedly moved out of their Sarasota house and left the country abruptly in the weeks before 9/11, leaving behind three luxury cars and personal belongings including clothing, furniture, and fresh food. They also left the swimming-pool water circulating.
...The news reports have said that the gated community’s visitor logs and photos of license tags showed that vehicles driven by several of the future hijackers, as well as other members of al Qaeda, had visited the al-Hijji home. The reports are based on an anonymous “counterterrorism agent” and Larry Berberich, the former head of security at the gated community where the al-Hijjis lived.
Unfortunately, lawmakers keep hitting a brick wall. When probing the extent of involvement of Saudi Arabia, they start to hit documents that are classified. Why do I bring up the attack of September 11, 2001? We are now seeing the exact same behavior pattern: a terrorist attack is created in order to get the U.S. Military - and the public - involved in a war in the Middle East. And here we are, on the 12th anniversary of the September 11 attack. 


Do not be fooled by the propaganda they are going to spout in the media in the coming days. Here is what they are going to say:
1. The U.N. Report "proves beyond a reasonable doubt" that chemical weapons were used in the attack of August 21. What THEY WILL NOT SAY is that there is no evidence linking it to Assad. THEY WILL NOT SAY that the United Nations thinks that the rebels launched the attack.
2. They will implicitly blame the government of Assad without providing any proof for that assertion. They will completely ignore the evidence that the Syrian rebels launched the attack.
3. "We cannot wait" and "we must act now" and "not acting will endanger the security interest of the United States" and "if we do not act now terrorists will acquire chemical weapons and attack us."
4. It is OK to approve military strikes because all we will do is launch a few Tomahawk missiles which will do nothing but exacerbate the civil war. There will be no ground troops. THEY WILL NOT SAY that there is now a buildup of U.S. troops in the surrounding region.
And to top it off, they will show dead bodies or people suffering from the attack of sarin gas. This is not factual evidence, it is emotional propaganda. Yes, a chemical attack occurred. There is not enough hard evidence as to who did it.


If U.S. policy was truly serious about limiting the chances of chemical weapons, they would cordon off the borders to Syria. They would stop arm shipments to the rebels. This of course would not only help stop the use of chemical weapons but would help end the civil war. But that is not acceptable as the U.S. and Saudi Arabia (and Qatar) are the ones aiding the rebels. This has nothing to do with stopping the use of chemical weapons. In fact, it encourages the use of terrorism and chemical weapons in order to start a war. Who is motivated more than any other group to launch a chemical weapon attack? The Syrian rebels. Who else benefits from our involvement? Al-Qaeda terrorists. Who benefits from a conflict between the U.S. and Russia? Saudi Arabia. The irony of this is just unbelievable.

Any evidence regarding the use of chemical weapons should be used in a war crimes trial. REGARDLESS of which side did it. If a U.S. ally did it, they should be held responsible. There should be no political preferences when it comes to the horrible use of weapons of mass destruction.

If I were to say one thing that President Obama did that was right is that he passed the decision to the U.S. Congress to vote on it. Under the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Congress has the right to declare war. But now, when they see they may lose the vote, some news media outlets are stating that the U.S. administration will ignore the vote and attack anyway. When asked what will they do should they lose the vote, they do not answer. In other words, the vote is useless. Should they do this, it will further undermine the U.S. Constitution. It is a step away from democracy, and a step towards martial law. The U.S. Constitution has already been undermined by the U.S. Patriot Act.

Looking at international politics, things are not always black and white. We are all pawns in a bigger game of chess, where the true players are hidden behind the scenes. Even the U.S. President is a pawn in this game.


Earlier in this blog I showed video evidence of UFOs appearing over the nuclear reactor of Japan in Fukushima, BEFORE it was hit by a tsunami. As it turns out, there are UFOs which have taken an interest in this civil war in Syria. Here is a UFO which appeared over Damascus, in the week after the attack:

Here is a scene from The Matrix (1999) again, which shows a scene very similar to the attack on the World Trade Center of September 11. I discussed it earlier on The Secret Space Program and Hidden Intelligence

And as we approach the 12th anniversary of the September 11 attack, here is Neo's passport again which expired on September 11, 2001:

Friday, September 6, 2013

The Secret Space Program and Hidden Intelligence

In Extraterrestrial Contacts by HAM Radio transmissions claimed to have come from flying saucers originating mainly within our solar system. As proof, the messages could predict where flying saucers would appear before it became known in the news days later. There is another possible long term prophecy in these radio messages which is explained below. Many of the messages claimed to be from Mars, as well as other planets in our solar system. One strange message indicated that Mars suffered from a recent nuclear explosion on the surface. Strangely enough, Japanese astronomer Tsuneo Saheki as well as others had observed a bright flash on the surface of Mars which lasted about 5 minutes, which was followed by an expanding white cloud. At the time there was much speculation that this was caused by a nuclear explosion. As strange as that sounds, this explanation persisted in later years. Frank B. Salisbury, Ph. D., wrote an article in the peer reviewed journal of Science (vol 136, April 6, 1962) entitled "Martian Biology" in which he said this:
"On several occasions observers of Mars have noticed a bright spot of light lasting about 5 minutes. Sometimes this has been followed by a rather distinctive white cloud, which grew in size and faded after about an hour. Was this volcanic activity, or are the Martians now engaged in debates about long-term effects of nuclear fallout?"
A volcano would not cause such a bright white flash. An atomic explosion would perfectly explain a bright white flash followed by an expanding white cloud. I read the article in more detail, Salisbury argues for possible life on Mars based on the following observations:
1. The canals of Mars. Curiosity rover has since proven that water once flowed on Mars, creating many of these canals as long suspected by astronomers since the 19th century.
2. The two moons of Mars may be artificial. Data indicates that Phobos is hollow. I discussed this in Extraterrestrial Contacts by HAM Radio - one of the radio messages mentioned that the moons were artificial and placed there to stabilize the orbit of Mars. Salisbury mentions two other sources that indicated that the moons of Mars may be artificial satellites (F. Zigel, Space World 1, 20 (1961) and T. Saheki, Sky and Telescope (Feb. 1955)).
3. The bright white flash which may have been a nuclear explosion.
4. Changing discolorations on the surface of Mars indicate that the surface may have plant life.
Salisbury concludes, "Of all the proposals put forth to account for the observed Martian phenomena, the idea of life on Mars seems to be the most tenable." Later in 1967 he published the article The Scientist and the UFO in which he recommended further scientific investigations of UFOs. His specialty was in plant exobiology. So have his theories proven correct, that there may be plant life on the surface of Mars? From the NASA web site Solar System Formation - Mars it states:
Though details of Mars' surface are difficult to see from Earth, telescope observations show seasonally changing features and white patches at the poles. For decades, people speculated that bright and dark areas on Mars were patches of vegetation, that Mars could be a likely place for life-forms and that water might exist in the polar caps. When the Mariner 4 spacecraft flew by Mars in 1965, many were shocked to see photographs of a bleak, cratered surface. Mars seemed to be a dead planet. Later missions, however, have shown that Mars is a complex member of the solar system and holds many mysteries yet to be solved.
So NASA states that there is no surface vegetation, referencing data from a mission from 1965. More recent missions indicate that Mars is a "complex member of the solar system." As it turns out, photographic data from more recent missions do give strong indication of vegetation on Mars - see Vegetation on Mars? The Case for the Trees and GIANT PLANT SPECIES FOUND ON MARS.

As for the possible nuclear explosion on Mars observed around the year 1950, in Extraterrestrial Contacts by HAM Radio I added an update - I found this odd article entitled Was There a Natural Nuclear Blast on Mars? from the year 2011, where John Brandenburg, Ph. D. said they found radioactive minerals on the surface of Mars indicating that it suffered from a nuclear blast. But NASA chimed in and said that to prove it, they would have to send a rover to that area of Mars. Another scientist Dr. Lars Borg says it is all part of a natural geological process. But then the article says something strange: "Brandenburg... defended his research, arguing that defense experts he talked to off the record said they agreed there are signs of a nuclear reaction."

So I ask a simple question: how is it that Brandenburg and military defense experts speaking off the record know something about a nuclear explosion on Mars that NASA does not know? Does anyone think that this is a bit odd? Someone pointed out to me this Astronomical Review article on John E. Brandenburg:
John E. Brandenburg is a plasma physicist at Orbital Technologies in Madison Wisconsin, working on space plasma technologies and space propulsion. He also performed research on the MET(Microwave Electro-Thermal) plasma thruster for space propulsion,  Rocket Plume-Regolith Interactions on the Moon and Mars, Vortex theory of Rocket engine design, and Kaluza-Klein theory of Field Unification for purposes of space propulsion.  He also performed an architecture study for a Human Mars Mission using solar electric propulsion.  Before coming to ORBITEC  he was performing research on air plasmas and plasma propulsion at Florida Space Institute. He is a pioneer in creating electrodeless atmospheric pressure plasmas in air using microwaves. Before this he was at The Aerospace Corporation, where one of his duties was as principle investigator of the MET propulsion project. Before coming to Aerospace corporation Dr. Brandenburg was a researcher at Research Support Instruments (RSI) where he specialized in making controlled laboratory plasmas for uses ranging from air plasmas for surface sterilization , Fusion research and  the MET thruster. He also worked as an independent consultant on Space Missile Defense, Directed Energy Weapons, and space rocket plume phenomenology, and also at Mission Research Corporation and Sandia National Laboratories on plasmas for controlled fusion and similar topics.
Brandenburg is a rocket scientist. Who worked on directed energy weapons. Not only that, he happens an interest in UFOs and extraterrestrials. He has published a huge work entitled Morningstar Pass: The Collapse of the UFO Coverup. From some of the information on this book from the reviews, this "fictional" work seems to be describing some stories reported by witnesses that are well known in ufological circles. So, does Brandenburg know something others do not, and like others, can only publish it as a work of fiction? Maybe.


This dichotomy of opinion between defense officials speaking off the record and NASA officials leads me to believe that the U.S. Government may have a secret space program that is kept hidden, one that is under the direction of the U.S. Military. I had already spoken about the hacker Gary McKinnon in the United Kingdom, who had broken into military computers and discovered a list of "non-terrestrial" officers and a strange list of ship to ship fleet transfers in the U.S. Navy - with ship names that are not used by any known naval vessel. So is there any evidence of a secret space program that the public does not know about? In an interview astronaut Gene Cernan let it slip in the interview that Buzz Aldrin "does want to go back to Mars." Excuse me, what? Did we already send astronauts to Mars? I then found this presentation from Aug. 6, 2012 by Richard Dolan, entitled, "The Case for a Secret Space Program." Richard Dolan is the author of UFOs and the National Security State and A.D. After Disclosure. He offers a very good analysis of the UFO phenomenon and the people in charge of keeping it secret (its a bit long, see summary below):

The main point he makes is that for the U.S. Military, the weaponization of space is absolutely essential. Just as air dominance changed the face of warfare in the last century, so space dominance will change the nature of warfare in the future. In fact it already has - satellite reconnaissance has been used extensively, especially in the recent Gulf Wars. So logically, it is safe to assume that there is a secret space program under the direction of the U.S. Military. And this is apparent in that both the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy have active areas of duty under the title of "Space Command." The existence of the "National Reconnaissance Office" was classified for 30 years from about 1960 to 1990 - so much so that it was a felony for a member of congress to even mention it. It was responsible for overseeing the U.S. military satellites in space.

So the U.S. Military has an interest in space dominance. Not only that, but in his research he uncovered official classified and secret government documents, which proves that the U.S. military and intelligence agencies know we are being visited by UFOs and they have an interest in investigating the matter further. I can't find the original publication, but see Twelve Government Documents that take UFOs Seriously. This is the exact opposite of what is said to the public. Whereas the public thinks this is a matter of ridicule, the UFO phenomenon is of utmost interest to the U.S. military and intelligence agencies.

Richard Dolan then covers NASA videos of UFOs in space, as well as evidence of UFOs and artificial artifacts in the vicinity of the Moon, Mars and Saturn. So if the U.S. military and intelligence agencies are seeing what we are seeing, the question arises, do they have the capability to investigate? Richard Dolan thinks yes, and for this he brings up the following evidence:
* James Goodall was an investigative reporter who did research into the military facility at Groom Lake in Nevada. He concluded that there were eight black programs flying out of Groom Lake.
* George Knapp, a TV journalist, investigated the Bob Lazar story and was able to uncover about 25 corroborations of his story. Bob Lazar had stated that the U.S. military is actively researching and developing space craft vehicles reverse engineered from other UFOs, with possible help from certain extraterrestrials. Nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman, another UFO researcher, thinks Bob Lazar is a fraud because his educational background cannot be verified. Records of key people who work on these black projects are often erased from public records, but that is another subject.
* Journalist Brad Sorenson (46:25) was invited to a private "flight demonstration" or "air show" and was taken to this huge hangar at Lockheed. It was surrounded by guards with M-16s. In this hangar, he saw three hovering flying saucers. He at first thought they were suspended in the air, but no, they were hovering above the ground. A four star general gave a lecture and stated that they ran on the vacuum. This was in 1988, a year before Harold Putoff wrote a paper on zero point energy. But here what was most significant about the lecture: the U.S. military had already traversed throughout the solar system doing their own reconnaissance.
* Clark McClelland (53:33) worked at NASA and was qualified to operate the space shuttle. Ben Rich, former CEO of Lockheed Skunkworks, stated that black budget money has put the U.S. military 50 years ahead of current technology. He then said "you have no idea where we have gone out there." Clark asks: "Mars?" Ben Rich nods yes. Clarks asks are there monuments on the Moon and Mars? "You can bet on it." Clark monitored one of the missions of the mid-1980s, and on one spacewalk saw an astronaut interacting with another astronaut on the space walk. This "other astronaut" was a giant: about 8 feet tall. Another colleague had seen one of these giant astronauts inside the shuttle - with helmet still on.
The last two points are what I was looking for. We have already explored the solar system. We have already put astronauts on Mars. It explains why Brandenburg and defense officials speaking off the record think that certain elements of Mars are radioactive, lending support that there was a nuclear explosion on the surface of the planet.

That is the main point I wanted to make from the presentation, but Richard Dolan also talks about his theory that there is an elite, secretive and extremely powerful organization that holds onto this knowledge concerning UFOs and extraterrestrials - something he calls a "breakaway civilization." So secret, that not even heads of the U.S. military have a complete picture of the situation. In order to keep this all secret, black projects had to not only be compartmentalized but also unacknowledged. Also this had to be put in the control of select private companies. And he suspects that U.S. tax dollars are not enough to finance it, and that other money has been directed to it by siphoning off funds from other areas. For this he recommends the book, Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins. And because of this extreme amount of highly concentrated power behind the scenes, disclosure will be very slow. From the ET perspective, he theorizes that earth is under a possible "quarantine." He is also not so naive to assume that all ETs are friendly, and seems to be aware of the abductions and mutilations. One possible view the ETs have of us: "The children have weapons."


So if the U.S. military has a secret space program, what would its objective be when it comes to Mars? The answer to that is obvious. They would setup a secret colony base there. In a previous blog post I already noted that Curiosity has taken several shots of a hovering flying saucer that just sits there observing the rover. And there is this odd case of a moving rock: first its there. Then it disappears. Then in a subsequent shot its in a completely different location. Somebody moved it. Among the other anomalies that have been seen on Mars, this one caught my attention. There is no mistaking it: there is an artificial dome structure in the middle of a crater. The original photo can be seen at Here it is again, turned sideways:

NASA's explanation? This golf-ball dome is a combination of volcanic uplift and patterned sand dunes. Here is a closeup of the dome in the crater:

See Golf Ball Crater, A Geodesic Dome on Mars? which compares this dome with a geodesic dome in the Antarctic. There are also some interesting shots of tubes on Mars.

So is there any other evidence that there is a secret colony or base on Mars, supported by a secret space program? Well consider this: the U.S. space shuttles have been mothballed. NASA scientists have said that astronauts cannot make the trip to Mars safely as they will be bombarded by cosmic radiation. So NASA is saying we have no way of getting there right now. So I ask a simple question: why in the world do we have the international Mars One program? Over 100,000 people have volunteered to go on a one way trip to Mars. And even though NASA is saying we have no way of getting to Mars, one of the members of the Mars One organization is Norbert Craft, M.D. This person is key. Here is his background:
Norbert Kraft, M.D., USA. Dr. Kraft received the 2010 Award for “Outstanding Accomplishments in the Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects of Aerospace Medicine”. He has over 17 years of experience in aviation and aerospace research and development. His primary area of expertise is developing physiological and psychological countermeasures to combat the negative effects of long-duration spaceflight. Dr. Kraft’s experiences span Europe, Asia, and the United States, where he has worked for several international space agencies, including the Russian Space Agency and the Japanese Space Agency. Dr. Kraft completed a 110 day isolation chamber project as commander of an international mixed gender crew and a spaceflight simulation experiment in Moscow, Russia. Since 2002, Dr. Kraft’s research at NASA has been developing new approaches to enhance team performance for exploration missions, to enable distributed crews to respond to unanticipated problems and to collaborate effectively under task stressors associated with space missions. Dr. Kraft is an author of over 40 papers in the field of aerospace medicine, including a seminal paper on intercultural crew issues in long-duration spaceflight. He has an M.D. from University of Vienna, Austria, and is a Fellow of the Aerospace Medical Association.
He worked for NASA. The same organization that says we can't go to Mars. So, WHAT'S UP DOC? What kind of volunteers are you looking for? Young, healthy and smart volunteers. Psychological strong in the face of hardship, creative problem solving, ability to work in a team with high morale. Single people. People with few family ties. I have this theory that those who volunteered may in fact be going to Mars sooner than they think. So what does the Mars One team say about the feasibility of living on Mars? Here is their answer from their web site Mars One - Technical Feasibility:

Basic elements required for a viable living system are already present on Mars. Thus we need to send more tools and equipment rather than raw elements. For example, the location for the first Mars One settlement is selected for the water ice content of the soil there. Water can be made available to the settlement for hygiene, drinking and farming. It is also the source of oxygen generated through electrolysis. Mars also has ample natural sources of nitrogen, the primary element (80%) in the air we breathe. Martian soil will cover the outpost to block cosmic radiation.
The astronauts will soon be able to create habitation for themselves and new crews using local materials soon after they arrive.

So there you go. They are basically saying that volunteers will live in an underground base on Mars. My opinion? That underground base is already there. And its near the south pole or north pole. If what Emanuel Swedenborg said about Mars in the 18th century is correct, there are probably other underground bases there that have been there for thousands of years. More and more scientists are now coming forth with data stating that life began on Mars...and arrived later on earth on a meteorite. Mars had the ability to sustain life long before planet Earth did before the surface and atmosphere of Mars was destroyed in a catastophe from long ago.


In the previous blog post Extraterrestrial Contacts by HAM Radio I discussed evidence of actual communication between Ham radio operators and flying saucers in the year 1952. Many of these messages claimed to have originated from Mars. Now there is again something interesting about the year 1952. I found this NASA document called Eyes on the Red Planet: Human Mars Mission Planning, 1952-1970. NASA apparently planned to go to Mars since 1952. Could this have been initiated by the NSA extraterrestrial radio signal and the HAM radio contacts of 1952? The NASA document indicates that Dr. Werner von Braun gave presentations for manned missions to Mars missions in August of 1969...and then all of a sudden nothing happens. All that planning, and nothing happens? Congress was critical of the plan...did the U.S. military go ahead and just do it in secret?

There is one message from the HAM radio contacts of 1952 that is just so strange I excluded it from the previous blog post, I initially did not know what to make of it. Here is the HAM radio message from September 20, 1952 from The Saucers Speak by George Hunt Williamson:
`This is Zo. We can hear you no matter what meter band you send on. We have heard all the messages you have sent to us by radio transmitter, and more. We have impressed you from time to time, and will continue to do so. Now what I am about to tell you will seem foolish. It is the way we do things at times. This is so it will all appear in a most conventional manner. You were impressed to go and see a certain motion picture. You did not know that the cartoon was Bugs Bunny in The Hasty Hare. We mentioned Bugs Bunny to you several times before, but you thought it was foolish and did not enter it into your records. We had our reasons. This cartoon was about a flying saucer and its coming to Earth. You saw the letter held in the hand of the saucer pilot and you noticed that its date was 9-27. This date is important in 1952. You will see!'
On September 27, 1952 the flying saucer came very close to the house of the HAM radio operator. But I am sorry, extraterrestrials from flying saucers contacting a HAM radio operator telling people to go see a Bugs Bunny picture??? This does seem ridiculous and foolish. Nevertheless, curiosity got the best of me and I decided to watch the Bugs Bunny episode of The Hasty Hare which was released in 1951. Here is a snapshot of the letter with the number 9-27 on it:

This letter is an order to Marvin the Martian, to go fly his flying saucer to retrieve one earthling and bring it back to Mars. And here we are, 50 years later, and we now have this international Mars One program to collect volunteers and send them on a one way trip to Mars. Looks like the Martian mission was successful, they sure have a lot of patience. And like Bugs Bunny, Mars One volunteers are most likely to live it out in an underground base:

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? I already excluded that this was a joke played on a Ham radio operator. There is information provided in the Ham radio messages that was later verified. And if someone is going to play a joke, they are going to sound realistic and think of something dramatic, not tell people to look for hidden messages in a Bugs Bunny movie. My theory is that the volunteers for Mars One will need to eat a lot of carrots to make their skin appear orange. Carrot juice for breakfast, carrots for lunch, carrot soup for dinner, and to top it off, carrot cake for dessert. With just a bit of orange skin coloring from carotenosis, Mars One volunteers will blend in with the surface colors to avoid being seen by those pesky little rovers that NASA keeps sending to the surface:

If my theory is correct, red heads will have priority for the Mars One program over other volunteers.


So, the explanation offered as to why the extraterrestrials communicate via movies is so that it will all appear very normal and not shock the public. The CIA - the Central Intelligence Agency - actively participates in providing advice for the scripts of Hollywood movies behind the scenes.  Chase Brandon, a former CIA agent who said the UFO Roswell crash really happened, was involved in this aspect of the CIA. But extraterrestrials leaving hints in movies? That is really strange. And they pick such a very obscure number that appear very briefly in a Bugs Bunny cartoon. Some people may say I am just "pulling a rabbit out of the hat" with this discussion. But let's explore this further. What about this number, which appears ever so briefly in the movie Inception:

Big deal. So what, the hotel room number is 528?  It is a hidden reference to Group 5-8, an elite unit within British Special Forces that deals with extraterrestrial matters. I wonder why Cobb has such an obsession with a toy dreidle:

So what in the world does the movie Inception have to do with extraterrestrials? You thought it was all about dreams, right? For more details on that matter, see Extraterrestrial Cattle Mutilations - and Secret Intelligence. It deals with a subject that is highly secretive and classified.

However, I suspect that not all readers are convinced. So lets take a look at the movie The Matrix, which came out in the year 1999. Remember when Agent Smith pulls out Neo's file to interview him? Take that file, zoom in, and turn it upside down. There is an interesting number on Neo's passport:

That's right. Neo's U.S. Passport EXPIRES ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.  You know, the same date as the attack on twin towers of the World Trade Center? Neo encounters a secretive group that are hunted down by these powerful agents. I prefer to call them the "Men in Black":

Unknown to the population at large, they are living in an illusion. The illusion is maintained and enforced by these Men in Black. Behind the illusion: human bodies - thousands upon thousands - are being kept asleep in chambers used as "batteries" for these synthetic beings:

These agents capture Morpheus and interrogate him. What do they want? They want to know the location of a secret undergound base known as Zion:

So what does this all have to do with the attack on the twin towers of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001?  Take a look at this particular scene from The Matrix:

Let's play "I Spy". I spy two towers. I spy MMI on a tower. And what is MMI doing there? It is the Roman numeral for the number 2001. The year 2001. So in the movie The Matrix, what happens on those two towers? Does it have any similarity to the attack of September 11? In case you forgot, watch the following clip from The Matrix very, very closely:

What a coincidence. So who knew? Who had foreknowledge of the attack? Extraterrestrial from the star systems of the Pleiades did. In 1987, a Plejaran known as Quetzal said this to Billy Meier in the year 1987 (from The Henoch Prophecies):
The USA will set out against the Eastern countries ahead of all other financial states and simultaneously she will have to defend herself against the Eastern intruders. In all, America will play the most decisive role, when in the guise to strive for peace and to fight against terrorism she invades many countries of the Earth, bombs and destroys everything and brings thousandfold deaths to the populations. The military politics of the USA will likewise know no limits, as neither will their economic and other political institutions which will be focused on building and operating a world police force, as it is the case already for a long time. But that will not be enough, and, in the guise of a so-called peaceful globalisation, American politics will aspire to gain absolute control of the world concerning supremacy in economy.
If things go too far in these future wars, the extraterrestrials will give up their anonymity:
And at this time, the possibility could become reality that extraterrestrial forces intervene against the Western industrialised countries, because these will be responsible for the extreme and enormous disaster of the coming evil times. These extraterrestrial forces will give up their anonymity and their state of secrecy and will assist those who are being terrorised by the irresponsibly acting Western countries, should this possibility become reality.
And then, the consequences of such irresponsible actions are then spelled out:
Far in the West, it will be different; the United States of America will be a country of total destruction. The cause for this will be manifold. With her global conflicts which are continuously instigated by her and which will continue far into the future, America is creating enormous hatred against her, worldwide, in many countries. As a result, America will experience enormous catastrophes which will reach proportions barely imaginable to people of Earth. The destruction of the WTC, i.e., the World Trade Center, by terrorists will only be the beginning.
SURPRISE!  I bet no one expected that one coming.


So why do I bring up the attack of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001? Because the Bush-Cheney administration then falsely used that attack to justify their invasion of Iraq in 2003. Iraq had nothing to do with it. And then the Bush-Cheney administration falsified intelligence stating that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. And somehow the identity of a CIA agent was exposed when her husband - an ambassador - found no evidence that uranium was sent to Iraq. And what is happening now? The current administration is stating that the Assad administration launched a chemical weapon attack against his own people, killing hundreds of children. Explain to me, why would he do that? Why would he cross that "red line" to risk attack from Western nations? Why would he do that when he has been winning the ground war and has control of Damascus? The answer is he would not. It is a "false flag" black ops operation - it was done by someone else and made to look like that Assad did it. As for the intelligence presented to U.S. lawmakers, is that factual? No it isn't. Whenever someone asks for facts, that becomes classified. Intelligence reports can become skewed and falsified, as it was done for Iraq. There is another agenda here: Syria is the backdoor or stepping stone towards an attack on Iran. The civil war also happens to be a proxy war between Saudi Arabia (the Sunnis) and Iran (the Shiites).

So while the western media as usual is vomiting its propaganda supporting a war (despite that over 90% of American citizens are opposed to it), I found this article: Syrians In Ghouta Claim Saudi-Supplied Rebels Behind Chemical Attack. Testimony from multiple rebel witnesses have said that Saudi Arabia, a U.S. ally, is behind the chemical attack:
...from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the dealing gas attack.
“My son came to me two weeks ago asking what I thought the weapons were that he had been asked to carry,” said Abu Abdel-Moneim, the father of a rebel fighting to unseat Assad, who lives in Ghouta.
Abdel-Moneim said his son and 12 other rebels were killed inside of a tunnel used to store weapons provided by a Saudi militant, known as Abu Ayesha, who was leading a fighting battalion. The father described the weapons as having a “tube-like structure” while others were like a “huge gas bottle.”
Ghouta townspeople said the rebels were using mosques and private houses to sleep while storing their weapons in tunnels.
Abdel-Moneim said his son and the others died during the chemical weapons attack. That same day, the militant group Jabhat al-Nusra, which is linked to al-Qaida, announced that it would similarly attack civilians in the Assad regime’s heartland of Latakia on Syria’s western coast, in purported retaliation.
“They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them,” complained a female fighter named ‘K.’ “We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.”
Later it says this:
According to U.K.’s Independent newspaper, it was Prince Bandar’s intelligence agency that first brought allegations of the use of sarin gas by the regime to the attention of Western allies in February.
So what is that classified intelligence briefing presented to U.S. lawmakers? Does it include intelligence reports from Saudi Arabia? Do you think that could be trusted? Can anyone believe this? If true, a vote of "yes" for military strikes means a vote of "yes" for terrorism. But that is not all. There is actual video evidence of rebels making use of chemical weapons. See Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies. And from a Syrian news report here is a shot of a chemical agent made in Saudi Arabia:

President Bashar al-Assad asked, "How is it possible that any country would use chemical weapons, or any weapons of mass destruction, in an area where its own forces are located?" But you will not hear that in western media, will you? If anyone attending the G-20 summit is reading this, do tell President Obama hello. For those of you in the U.S., do call or write your representative in congress - and give them your own intelligence report.

Now for the exact same scene from The Matrix which eerily seems to match "The Dream is Collapsing" and the trailer music from the movie of Inception:

Almost forgot. Coincidentally in The Matrix, Neo gets this strange message on his computer screen: