Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Scientific Proof of Biological Precognition

Here is some interesting news: science is catching up with religious revelation.  That is, it has discovered evidence that our biological system is precognitive.  Precognition has been an interest of mine for a long time: it is one of those oddball pieces of information we try to shut out and ignore as it does not fit in with our view of how time should behave.  Rather than proving the existence of God, which requires certain assumptions to be made, it is easier to prove whether or not prophecy exists.  There are of course prophecies in the Bible, but those who have read up on modern Biblical criticism will note that scholars try to put these prophecies as having been written after the fact.  While this can be theorized for many of the Biblical prophecies, there is one in the book of Daniel that is harder to explain away.  So rather than concentrate on Biblical prophecies, instead I gathered evidence for prophecy from the writings of Nostradamus.  Unlike the Bible, it is impossible to state that the prophecy was written after the fact.  I at first intended to just publish a book on Nostradamus prophecies, but after gathering all the evidence I discovered he embedded a numerical coding system in each prophecy, by which he had mixed them up.  This delayed publication for several years - but at least the first volume is now out as an e-book in The Decoded Prophecies of Nostradamus.

I had heard about scientific evidence for biological precognition before.  The experiment I heard about is that they took some subjects, and each subject would be randomly shocked by an electrical shock at random times.  Each subject was wired to electrodes.  Here is the interesting thing: when the scientists examined the data, a few milliseconds before a random subject was about to be shocked they measured something in the nervous system in the body - where the body started to tense up - right before the person was shocked.  It is as if something in the body knew beforehand it was about to be shocked.

So that is what I had heard long time ago, and forgot about it.  Well apparently a group of scientists decided to gather the evidence of these experiments that have been occurring over the past 24 years.  And now the evidence is harder to ignore.  Here is a quote from Science-A-Gogo:

After reviewing previous studies into "anomalous anticipatory activity," researchers at Northwestern University think the phenomenon might be related to recent findings in the field of quantum biology.Published in the journal Frontiers in Perception Science, the new meta-study is based on an analysis of the results of 26 studies published between 1978 and 2010.Researchers already agree that our subconscious minds sometimes know more than our conscious minds. "Physiological measures of subconscious arousal, for instance, tend to show up before conscious awareness," explained the review's lead author Julia Mossbridge. "What hasn't been clear is whether humans have the ability to predict future important events even without any clues as to what might happen."

Ok, so science seems to have gotten as far as showing significant evidence of precognition at least milliseconds or seconds into the future. They are still uncertain about whether this is possible years into the future. But those who have read the prophecies of Nostradamus already know the answer to that question.

So the evidence is there.  Science can see the effect.  The cause?  Utter silence.  Science can only study effects.  The causes in themselves are hidden. For those who have studied Swedenborg, the answer is already known.  Our bodies do not exist by themselves.  Our bodies receive life through spiritual influx. We are spiritual beings - that is what makes us alive.  Swedenborg describes this in the following passage:
Man does not know at all that he is governed of the Lord by means of angels and spirits; and that with every man there are at least two spirits, and two angels. Through spirits communication of man with the world of spirits is effected, and through angels with heaven. Without communication through spirits with the world of spirits, and through angels with heaven, and so through heaven with the Lord, man can by no means live. His life entirely depends on that conjunction. If the spirits and angels should withdraw, he would perish in a moment. (Heavenly Arcana, n. 50)
With each person, there are at least two angels, and two spirits:
There are at least two evil spirits and two angels with every man. Through the evil spirits a man has communication with hell; and through the angels, with heaven. Without communication with both a man cannot live a moment. Thus every man is in some society of the infernals, though he is unaware of it. But their torments are not communicated to him, because he is in a state of preparation for eternal life. The society in which a man has been is sometimes shown to him in the other life; for he returns to it, and so into the life that he had in the world; and from thence he either tends toward hell, or is raised up toward heaven. Thus a man who does not live in the good of charity, and does not suffer himself to be led by the Lord, is one of the infernals, and after death becomes also a devil. (Heavenly Arcana, n. 697)
For reasons too long to explain here, direct communication - in most cases - between man and angel is forbidden.  General emotions, feelings, intuitions - all indirect and implicit - allowed.  One reason for this is that it is important for each individual to choose according to their free will.  Another reason is that our inner person must be purified from sin before any direct communication is allowed.  As most dont bother to do this, most of us live in the dark.  So, even though direct communication is forbidden, lets return to that shock experiment.  Angels are highly intelligent and can foresee things a bit more than us, and their thoughts are extremely fast.  So even though the communication is not allowed, I can just imagine them saying, OK, we are about to get shocked.  And in those few milliseconds before that shock hits the body, the body tenses up.  Looks like their code of silence has been broken.  Who said one can't see angels dancing on the pin of a needle?  At least that's my theory.

And now, a session of unorthodox shock therapy with psychiatrist Marvin Monroe.  See if you can guess who will be shocked next:






Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: the True Ancient Faith



What is Orthodox?  Is it the belief that there are three Divine persons from eternity?  Or that there is One Divine Person, who Himself became incarnate?  Which one of these beliefs is Monotheistic, and which one is Tritheistic?  Should we let a church council of men tell us what is true, or should we not depend on Divine revelation?  Should not God reveal to us Who He is?  At what point in time did God reveal that He is more than one person?  Defining what is Orthodox requires a standard. But where should that standard come from? It should come from revealed scripture. Our view of scripture, however, is defined by doctrine, and without revealed doctrines scripture can be turned to support various heresies. We all come with a bias and what we have been taught as children. Religion is persuasive, and rarely do people self-examine their own religion.

I bring this up as someone pointed to my attention that an Orthodox minister in Pennsylvania did a podcast on "Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy" (podcast here) Among heterodox views he discusses the Swedenborgian or New Church view (go past the first 15 minutes).  While he got a general biography of Swedenborg right, there are a couple of main points on the theology of the New Church that he completely gets wrong. And unfortunately, he has apparently followed up the podcast with a book where he probably repeats the same misrepresentation of the New Church, or what was revealed to Swedenborg.  It is unfortunate, because there are certain points in the New Church theology that are very similar to the Orthodox view.  In the end of the podcast he does admit he may have "glossed" over certain issues and may have got some stuff wrong.

Lets first summarize where the podcast is correct on representing the New Church. It is correct that there is a Trinity which exists completely in one person Jesus Christ, just as there is a trine of soul, body and operation in each and every person. He briefly mentions that this is the same as Unitarianism but this is incorrect. It is more in line with Oneness Pentecostals, as Jesus is acknowledged as Jehovah in human form, and not as just some angelic messenger or prophet. He describes correctly the doctrine of "correspondence" - where everything in the material world is symbolic of something higher that exists in the spiritual world.  And although the New Church affirms the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ, for all others there will only be a resurrection in one's spiritual body.  The belief in a physical resurrection for everybody is based on a false literal interpretation of the Bible, not to mention it completely goes against known science.  According to the New Church view, the final judgment occurs in the afterlife, not in this world.  Recent experiences from many witnesses who have had a Near Death Experience confirms this view.

As our understanding of science increases, the debate over whether or not one shall rise in one's physical body or just a spiritual one will probably become a moot point.  Swedenborg stated that our soul is composed of a spiritual substance that does not interact with light.  So if there is an entire spiritual world out there (or inside of us) that does not interact with light, how would we ever see it?  We can't.  Science is currently grappling with a similar situation where it is dealing with something called "Dark Matter" - apparently the majority of the matter in the universe comes from matter that does not interact with light. Scientists know it is there through gravitational lensing.  I am not a scientist, but I am wondering if space-time can become permanently "warped" without the introduction of Dark Matter. I don't think this has been proposed because thus far everyone follows Einstein's theory that space-time only becomes warped in the presence of matter. But if we look at evidence for Dark Matter, its shape is odd: it appears in long strings or filaments in the paths where the centers of galaxies have passed, if I have read correctly. As a black hole passes through space, does it permanently warp it? I bring this up because Dark Matter is known to exist from its gravitational effects. I remember someone telling me that at time of death, there is mysterious slight drop in one's body weight. Unfortunately I cannot find the study that mentions this finding. Is there Dark Matter inside of us? Interesting thought. Believing would no longer be seeing: there is a limit to our physical senses.

So returning to that podcast. Here is the first point that the Orthodox minister completely gets wrong on the New Church, and I will just quote him verbatim:

[The New Church view is that] "Christ is the greatest manifestation of humanity, but did not atone for mankind's sin on the cross. His mission was not to redeem from sin, but rather to show the nature and reality of spiritual life, and to provide an example of it."

FIRST: Jesus is the greatest manifestation of Divinity, not humanity.  Man is made in God's image, and that is the reason why God could become incarnate in a human.  He took His Human and made it Divine. The podcast later corrects this statement as he states that the New Church view is that Jesus is God made manifest in human flesh. By "greatest manifestation of humanity" is thus meant He was the most perfect human being.

SECOND: Let us clarify what is meant by that he did not atone for mankind's sin on the cross. In the New Church view, the cross was the last temptation that Jesus had to suffer. There is no such thing as "vicarious atonement" where sins are transferred from one person to another. Rather, by making His Human Divine, Jesus was able to save all of humanity. God can now interact directly on each and every human being without the intervention of angels. He is our sole Mediator. Every time we repent and acknowledge our specific sins, and fight against them, the Lord acts inside of us to fight against evil. That is how humanity is saved. It is not through lip-service, but by actual repentance. (Protestant theology, by the way, has a tendency to stress belief only or lip-service, and states that we are a passive subject where there is no will-power to act. I digress again.)

THIRD: I have no idea how he came up with this statement: "His mission was not to redeem from sin, but rather to show the nature and reality of spiritual life, and to provide an example of it." This is completely false, and I have no idea where he got this viewpoint. It looks like he has not read Swedenborg's writings, and might be depending on second-hand information. The sole mission of Jesus was to redeem all of humanity against the threat of eternal damnation and hell. Swedenborg goes further: he was told that if God did not intervene, humanity would have sunk into such depravity and evil that the entire race would have been destroyed. God intervened to save humanity and redeem all from sin. We participate in that salvation by actual repentance.

A more conciliatory view would have been how Swedenborg's writings reveal many of the inner Christian mysteries that have not been properly understood. But lets remove any doubt that this last statement is false.  I will quote from "True Christian Religion", paragraph #3:

Jehovah "descended and assumed the Human, to the end that He might reduce to order all things which were in heaven, and all things which were in hell, and all things which were in the church; because at that time the power of hell prevailed over the power of heaven, and upon earth the power of evil over the power of good, and thence a total damnation stood before the door and threatened. This impending damnation Jehovah God removed by means of His Human, which was Divine truth, and thus He redeemed angels and men; and afterward He united in His Human Divine truth with Divine good or Divine wisdom with Divine love, and thus together with and in the glorified Human returned into His Divine, in which He was from eternity."

Later in the podcast he states that the final judgment after death is "self-realization" based on one's choices, and God will not judge or condemn anyone. Let us clarify that: we are all born with a conscience, and that conscience will judge each and every one of our actions. We have conscience due to the inflowing of the Divine Truth into our soul. Many who have come back from a Near Death Experience state that went through a life-review in an instant, where they saw the impact of all of their choices in life. All of our actions will be judged according to the Divine Truth. Our internal state of being determines where we go.

Next, he states that all who are married in this life will continue with the same spouse in heaven. This is not completely true. You will have a soul-mate as long as your mind and heart loves the other. Some marriages are not by choice, and I have seen many marriages that were arranged where the partners hate each other's guts. In many situations, it is wiser to stay together for the sake of the children - there are thus many "apparent" marriages on earth that become dissolved in heaven. I am not condoning divorce, but the situations where that is allowed is again beyond the scope of this article. As for marriages in heaven, he states that this goes against Jesus' teachings on the matter, but in that case the words of Jesus have an internal spiritual meaning. This is fully discussed in the work "Angelic Wisdom concerning Marriage Love."

Lastly, he states that Swedenborg and the New Church have a tendency to spiritualize everything, divorced from the material.  This again is not true.  A true spiritual life must live in conjunction with its outward material life.  You cannot just believe and continue to live in sin, and Swedenborg stresses this over, and over, and over again.  Belief only is NOT faith, you have to live by what God has commanded.  Moreover, there is conjunction between the spiritual and physical world through symbolic rituals.  This is one major point where the New Church and the Orthodox Church agree upon and he gets it wrong.

On a positive note, he recognizes that those that belong to the New Church are encouraged to pay attention to dreams, prayer and meditation: he thus sees that this strong mystical tradition is compatible with the Orthodox faith. He also recognizes that both the New Church and the Orthodox Church recognize that scripture has an internal spiritual meaning. So, I have some hope that in the future there will be better understanding, and a better dialogue.  Of the three main branches of Christianity, Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox, if I had to pick one I would prefer Orthodox.  Unfortunately, as long as the Orthodox Church holds onto the Nicene Creed I could never join that faith. I would have hope if the Orthodox church would relegate that creed to a footnote in an obscure theological thesis. If theology was comparable to the Java language, that creed should be "deprecated." Still there but never used any more, because the designer of the API did not think things through correctly. There is a previous entry in this blog on the Nicene Creed, how it is a corruption of the original Apostles' Creed.  So if one wants to return back to the True Ancient Faith of Christianity, let us go back not to the fourth century of the Nicene Creed, let us go back to the first century, where it was recognized that the Son was not born from eternity, but in time, to the virgin Mary. Let us go back to worshiping one God, Jehovah, who has become manifest in human form.  The New Church seeks to restore the original message of Christianity: my prayer is more people will know about it.

He numbers those that belong to the New Church worldwide at about 65,000 - or even less, maybe 30,000. He then wonders if any were present to listen to his speech. But no one should care about numbers. As Anatole France once said, "If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."





Saturday, October 6, 2012

Nostradamus Prophecies and Petrodollar Warfare

For those who are familiar with the prophecies of Nostradamus, or who have studied them, the last big chunk of remaining prophecies that remain to be fulfilled concerns a great war between the West and East.  In one passage, Nostradamus states that this great war will last 27 years.  It is from these prophecies that on the CBS documentary, Mysteries of the Ancient World, that I said we should expect an eastern alliance between Iran and China.  I did not consider how this would happen, but I had told the producers that this would be the event to look for in the future based on the track record of Nostradamus.  Here is the clip:


Do not misinterpret my views on Islam from this clip.  I consider Islam to have happened from Divine providence, to help eliminate idolatry and replace it with monotheism.  The Antichrist I am talking about here will have a very distorted philosophy, and will use religious hatred in his ascendancy to world power.  Religious hatred is powerful - it brainwashes people's minds into thinking that killing other people who are different is OK.  My closest friends tend to be Muslim, as they follow practice their religion more diligently than I have seen than Christians in the west. Remember, brainwashing and propaganda will always precede the war or acts of genocide, in order to justify it.  The apartheid situation in Israel is not going to help the situation.  Pride always precedes the fall, and Jews should not consider one race as superior or better than others. Remember, we are all children of God.  Remember the Good Samaritan.

So, to understand why wars take place, and how to predict the wars of the future, consider this: the U.S. dollar is a fiat currency.  That is, there is no gold to back it up.  Instead, in the world economy today most nations must buy their oil using U.S. dollars.  So it is not really a fiat currency, it is a petro currency.  But still, the U.S. can publish money at will.  Consider the economics of the petrodollar: it explains the war in Iraq, the war in Libya, and the current sanctions on Iran.  I have been researching petrodollar warfare recently, and I found two great youtube videos that explain it in a simple manner.  See them below.  The second one explains the connection between Iran and China.



So, after looking at the above videos, especially the second one, I am convinced that the sanctions on Iran have nothing to do with its nuclear program.  There is no evidence they want to use it for nuclear weapons.  Instead, it is in U.S. interests to stop the sale of oil in exchange for currencies that do not include the U.S. dollar.

So what to do?  This is a big problem.  I would suggest the following:

1. The U.S. should revive its nuclear energy program. NOW.  We have got to reduce our dependency on foreign oil.
2. Invest in alternate energies.  But right now, nuclear energy is the only viable alternative.  Governments should provide tax credits for those who buy hybrid cars.
3. Recognize and resolve religious hatred.  Promote a better understanding of Islam and stop demonizing it.
4. Recognize and resolve racial hatred.  The state of Israel, like south Africa was, is an apartheid state.  This racial hatred is hidden within a religious facade.  Not an easy problem to solve here, the only way I see to resolve it is to have a single state, where both Jews and Palestinians enjoy rights as equal citizens.  That is a big step, which requires a big shift in attitude.  Telling someone that they should "cease to exist" is not exactly a good start for negotiation.

So how to move away from a petrodollar economy?  I do not know.  Russia and China are already moving away from the U.S. Dollar.  All currencies should be based on hard goods.  In the case of the U.S., we ran out of gold.  But gold is not the only option, there are other metals, such as silver.  This is something I will be researching more in the future, if someone can point me to a good economist on this please let me know.