Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Jeb Bush and the Neocon War Plans

I recently had a deja vu experience, where it seemed like it was the year 2000 all over again and people had not learned anything for the past 16 years.  I woke up and thought it was just a nightmare.  But I then realized it is not a nightmare, we are living it.  Jeb Bush, a brother of George Bush is running for President.  And look at all the political advisors behind Jeb Bush: they are many of the same people that orchestrated the war on Iraq based on a known lie.  From Jeb Bush’s foreign policy team is eerily familiar:

Here is a who's who, from Jeb Bush’s five Iraq war architects make up an eerily familiar roster:
Paul Wolfowitz – As an advocate and chief architect of the Iraq War, George W. Bush’s deputy secretary of defense argued that the war would be a quick engagement, sectarian violence wouldn’t be an issue, and that the U.S. would be “greeted as liberators.” Wrong!
John Hannah—As deputy national security adviser to then-Vice President Dick Cheney, Hannah passed false information about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction that was used to justify the invasion. He also played a key role in writing a speech that then-Secretary of State Colin Powell delivered in making a case for war to the United Nations, a speech Powell has since said will be a permanent “blot” on his record.
Porter Goss – The former CIA director defended torture techniques, including waterboarding, which he described in 2005 as a “professional interrogation technique.”
Stephen Hadley – George W. Bush’s deputy national security adviser disregarded memos from the CIA and a direct call from its then-director George Tenet urging the administration to not assert that Iraq tried to buy nuclear weapons materials in Africa. It was still included in Bush’s State of the Union speech.
Michael Hayden – As George W. Bush’s National Security Agency director, he played a key role in overseeing an illegal, warrantless eavesdropping program in the U.S. after the 9/11 attacks.
So what kind of foreign policy advise is Jeb Bush receiving? It would be a bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities - and they have come out in the open and publicized this objective. From Neocon Calls To Bomb Iran——The Vile Bile Of Wannabe War Criminals John Bolton And Joshua Muravchik:
Bolton, who served as President George W. Bush’s ambassador to the United Nations, based his call for war on the possibility that if Iran did develop a nuclear bomb – which Iran denies seeking and which the U.S. intelligence community agrees Iran is not building – such a hypothetical event could touch off an arms race in the Middle East.
Curiously, Bolton acknowledged that Israel already has developed an undeclared nuclear weapons arsenal outside international controls, but he didn’t call for bombing Israel. He wrote blithely that “Ironically perhaps, Israel’s nuclear weapons have not triggered an arms race. Other states in the region understood — even if they couldn’t admit it publicly — that Israel’s nukes were intended as a deterrent, not as an offensive measure.”
Thus we see a concerted effort from Republican senators to sabotage negotiations with Iran (see The Hope of Easter and the Iranian Nuclear Deal). George W. Bush recently gave a rare public speech also criticizing the negotiations. From George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East, Bush said this:
Bush said that Obama’s plan to lift sanctions on Iran with a promise that they could snap back in place at any time was not plausible. He also said the deal would be bad for American national security in the long term: “You think the Middle East is chaotic now? Imagine what it looks like for our grandchildren. That’s how Americans should view the deal.” 
Did Bush think about that when he invaded Iraq?  Does he acknowledge that the rise of ISIS is directly the result of his war policy in Iraq, and the suppression of the Sunni Baathists?  This was not accidental, this is BY DESIGN. From a 2002 article U.S. Considers Dividing Iraq Into Three Separate States After Saddam Is Gone:

"Stratfor believes the plan would divide Iraq as follows:
  1. The central and largest part of Iraq that is populated by the Sunni Arabs would be joined with JORDAN to form one "United Hashemite Kingdom," which would be ruled by Jordan's King Abdullah.  This area would include Baghdad, which would no longer be the capital.
  2. The Kurdish region of northern and northwestern Iraq, including Mosul and the vast Kirkuk oilfields, would become its own autonomous state.
  3. The Shia Region in southwestern Iraq, including Basra, would make up the third state, or more likely it would be joined with Kuwait.
Stratfor's sources indicate that the plan to divide (and thus eliminate) Iraq as described above is not the only plan under consideration, and it is also not finalized."

And where did this plan come from?  Straight out of Israel. From Plan For Iraq Invasion Drawn Up Decades Ago:
An ambitious report entitled "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s," which appeared in the World Zionist Organization's periodical Kivunim in February 1982 disclosed a strategy aimed at making the whole of the Middle East a kind of "living space" for Israel. The report, drawn up by Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist and formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel, set out the scenario of the "division of Iraq"
As with Iraq in the year 2000, despite what the media is telling the public, intelligence agencies agree that Iran is not seeking to build a nuclear bomb.  However, despite the evidence, Netanyahu came up with a drawing (similar to the one below) that conclusively proves Iran is building a bomb:

That is what Israel wants the public to see: a cartoon. Here is what they don't want you to see: Israel's stockpile of nuclear weapons, which they keep at the Dimona nuclear facility:

Details of Israel's secret nuclear facility were revealed to the public in 1986:

From the book Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare, investigative journalist Gareth Porter sums up the western propaganda war against Iran:
In it, award-winning investigative journalist Gareth Porter offers a well documented critique of the official 'western' account of what the Iranian government has been doing, and why. In Manufactured Crisis, Porter brings together the results of his many years of research into the issue--including numerous interviews with former insiders. He shows that the origins of the Iran nuclear "crisis" lay not in an Iranian urge to obtain nuclear weapons but, rather, in a sustained effort by the United States and its allies to deny Iran its right, as guaranteed in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to have any nuclear program at all. The book highlights the impact that the United States' alliance with Israel had on Washington's pursuit of its Iran policy and sheds new light on the US strategy of turning the International Atomic Energy Agency into a tool of its anti-Iran policy.
According to General Wesley Clark, the military plan to attack Iran was finalized right after 9-11:

So why Iran, if there is no plan to build a nuclear bomb?  It is solely for political and regional control.  Even if Iran built a nuclear weapon, it would only be for a deterrent.  Political analyst Noam Chomsky makes this point (see starting at 2:17):

If Israel was really concerned about "self defense" as they always claim, they would not practice racial apartheid against the Palestinians.  Creating an apartheid state only inflames radical terrorists - not to mention that it is contrary to the Jewish laws of the Torah.

Who is the aggressor here? Which nation has invaded other countries on false pretenses?  Which nation has stolen land from the natives and denied them basic human rights? Do not be deceived by false media propaganda.


And if that's not bad enough, here is this:



Here is a summary of the cost to the U.S. for the Iraq War:

The above does not provide an accurate death count. The total death count for the war in Iraq is not 4,475.  It is closer to 190,000 deaths:

Moreover, Iraq has experienced an outflow of refugees.  This created the situation for the rise of ISIS:

Recently Jeb Bush was asked about the Iraq war.  From Jeb Bush doesn’t want to talk about the Iraq war, he said, "I won't talk about the past."  Why is that?  The above infographics tell it all. And yet, he does talk about it in his released emails as Florida governor. Here is an excerpt from What’s in Jeb Bush’s emails?:
“This war will make George W go down as the worst president in history and you will suffer for that too,” one emailer wrote on March 17, 2003, just ahead of the invasion.
Jeb Bush was quick to defend his brother.
“I respectfully disagree with you. I think our President is right on track,” he wrote. “His speech tonight made our position clear and I am gratified that 60% of the American public agrees. I truly respect your point of view but don’t believe that we are on the wrong track.”

Here is a quatrain Nostradamus wrote for America in the 16th century.  Keep in mind, America wasn't even a nation yet and had just been discovered.  It was not known which European country would come to dominate and colonize the country:

Quatrain X-66
Le chef de Londres par regne l'Americh,
L'isle d'Escosse temptera par gellee:
Roy Reb auront un si faux antechrist,
Que les mettra trestous dans la meslee.

The leader of London for the realm of America,
The Scottish isle will be tried by frost:
They will have King Reb, a very false antichrist,
Until he will put them all in the fight.

The quatrain predicts that England - the United Kingdom - would follow the lead of America into a very evil war.  Didn't this happen for the war in Iraq?  Ever since it was written there has been a lot of speculation as to who "King Reb" is - who or what was Nostradamus referring to?  There are several other quatrains that not only predict an exact date, but give exact names as well.  In many of them he makes use of anagrams, in which it is allowed to change one letter.  Could KING REB have been an anagram for KING JEB?  The Bush family does seem like a dynasty chosen by the powerful rather than those by the people.  Hopefully I am wrong, perhaps REB is an anagram for REPUBLICAN and this quatrain has already been fulfilled in the past.

What of Scotland suffering from frost?  It should be noted, ironically, that global warming will lead to increased snowfall.  Global warming puts more moisture in the air, leading to greater precipitation of snow in the winter (see It’s Cold and My Car is Buried in Snow. Is Global Warming Really Happening?).  In 2014 a renowned snow climber noted in that year he has seen more snow in Scotland than the past 69 years: see Most snow in hills in 69 years, says Hamish MacInnes.  But one wonders, will anyone notice or care?

And what about Florida, Jeb Bush's home state?  It's even worse - state officials are not allowed to mention the phrase "climate change" or "global warming" or "sea level rise":

The below passage has a hidden spiritual meaning, but in the literal sense I think it is a bit relevant:

And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. (Luke 21:25-28)

1 comment:

  1. Make no mistake, Jeb Bush is running a campaign of fear. In a speech he said "our enemies need to fear us again." See Jeb Bush: Our enemies must 'fear' US again. This means there are already war plans in place should he be elected.


Comments, questions, corrections and opinions welcome...